← Back to team overview

maas-devel team mailing list archive

Re: Releasing broken nodes

 

On 6 August 2014 09:19, Gavin Panella <gavin.panella@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> There are different classes of "broken" as we modelled in the node
> lifecycle last week. One of them is the Needs Attention "state", which
> is less a status and more a flag, because the node can continue
> operations. The others were proper states, iirc. We probably want to
> change the mark_broken() and mark_fixed() calls to transition a node
> into origin-state-specific broken states, if that makes sense. Or we
> could model it all with flags. I don't know, but it's clear that
> mark_broken() and mark_fixed() were forged in a simpler age.
>

Right, I'll add a card.


References