maas-devel team mailing list archive

[Carla Berkers <carla.berkers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Looks good, thanks Jeff.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Jeff Jones <jeff.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Here's the latest. 'make styles' did the trick, thanks.
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Jeff Jones <jeff.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> We discussed this in the maas-team standup and decided to keep the maas
>> version and the warning on differing versions.
>>
>> .jeff
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Carla Berkers <
>> carla.berkers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, it is looking really good!
>>>
>>> Agreed we should keep the zone. The following layout in this order
>>> matches what we agreed (and is consistent with node details):
>>>
>>> on the left:
>>> - Type
>>> - Last image sync
>>> - Zone
>>> - Fabrics
>>> - DHCP
>>>
>>> and on the right:
>>> - CPU
>>> - RAM
>>> - Storage
>>> - OS
>>> - MAAS version
>>>
>>> The build should match this layout. Jeff there are no updated designs,
>>> at this point we are editing in code to save time.
>>>
>>> I've been thinking about MAAS version. If it is the same as the region
>>> version it is not useful info for the user - in fact it might be
>>> unnecessarily confusing.
>>> If the controller version is different from the region version we should
>>> display an error.
>>> So I think we should remove it from the summary and make sure we have an
>>> error message in place - what do you think Blake?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Carla
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Blake Rouse <blake.rouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think Jeff is correct in keeping the zone. Zone is a physical zone
>>>> and a rack controller must exists in that physical zone. But overall it is
>>>> looking really good.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Richard McCartney <
>>>> richard.mccartney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey Jeff,
>>>>>
>>>>> I’ve pulled down your working branch for MAAS HA, you need to run make
>>>>> styles as your not using the new updated styles at all and it should fix
>>>>> the issue with the tree & table styles. Regarding the information summary
>>>>> this has been finalised in our design catchups and should look like the
>>>>> following screenshot I have attached. Apart from that everything else so
>>>>> far looks correct in your working branch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> *Richard McCartney*
>>>>> Front End Web Developer
>>>>> Cloud & Web Team
>>>>>
>>>>> ubuntu.com | canonical.com
>>>>>
>>>>> richard.mccartney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> +44 (0) 792 183 4505
>>>>>
>>>>> On 16 Feb 2016, at 03:08, Jeff Jones <jeff.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rich,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've attached a shot of a working first rev of the controller details
>>>>> page.
>>>>> This includes all your code from  lp:~ricgard/maas/rack-details.
>>>>>
>>>>> Questions:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Some of the summary items in your HTML differ from the node details
>>>>> page and Carla's mock. (no zone, OS, status on left, DHCP on right,
>>>>> etc) I've moved them around a bit to make them more consistent with
>>>>> both. Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Does the tree look right to you? I integrated all your CSS changes,
>>>>> etc, and that part of the HTML is rote from your branch. You can look
>>>>> at the HTML in my branch at lp:~trapnine/maas/ha_rack_details  - feel
>>>>> free to submit any HTML changes there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jeff
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. Has the original sketch from Carla been updated?
>>>>> (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BxXAS-9xXKkLZHhWMEJ6OE55NHc/view)
>>>>> <controller_details.png>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *Carla Berkers*
>>> Lead UX Designer
>>> Cloud & Web Teams
>>> +44 7926121959
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 

*Carla Berkers*
Lead UX Designer
Cloud & Web Teams
+44 7926121959