mahara-contributors team mailing list archive

[Robert Lyon <robertl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There has not been much complaining with the new suffix naming of pages
and now that it has been around for over a year it has become the
'normal' way.

Starting with v.2 actually makes sense in the fact that it is the 2nd
version of the original.

(Then again v.1 makes sense as it is the first copy of the original)

I feel it is probably best to stay with the new status quo now rather
than try and "fix" and create more issues.

** Changed in: mahara/16.10
       Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix

** Changed in: mahara
       Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mahara
Contributors, which is subscribed to Mahara.
Matching subscriptions: Subscription for all Mahara Contributors -- please ask on #mahara-dev or mahara.org forum before editing or unsubscribing it!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481450

Title:
  Should copied page names start at "v.2" or "v.1" (or something else)?

Status in Mahara:
  Won't Fix
Status in Mahara 16.10 series:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  In Mahara master (15.10dev), the page version numbers were changed and
  a "v." added. However, now the page version numbers start at 2 instead
  of 1. In a sense that is correct because the original page would be
  version 1, but without actually seeing that version number, it is
  confusing why there would be version 2 when no version 1 can be seen.

  Do others feel the same or am I overthinking things?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mahara/+bug/1481450/+subscriptions