maria-developers team mailing list archive
-
maria-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04580
Re: Is our annotate_rows_log_event same as mysql-5.6's?
Sergei Petrunia <psergey@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I see MySQL have added an analog ours
> http://kb.askmonty.org/en/annotate_rows_log_event
>
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/replication-options-binary-log.html#sysvar_binlog_rows_query_log_events
>
> The names of the options are different: binlog_annotate_row_events vs. binlog_rows_query_log_events
> Questions (I assume you can answer them off the top of the head, if not, let's
> first discuss it)
>
> - Is it true that they have re-implemented the feature after we did?
Yes.
> - Do I understand correctly that the features are not compatible? (different
> event code)
Yes.
However, I checked the MySQL version some time ago. It is extremely similar to
our version. I believe it will be quite feasible when merging to make them
compatible, eg. just translate the event code from one to the other. Maybe we
will just merge the MySQL version for compatibility (MySQL developers do not
seem to care about compatibility themselves), and then just add backwards and
forwards compatibility translation so we work with old versions of MariaDB.
> - Do these features do the same thing or one is better than the other in some
> respect?
As I remember, they are essentially identical.
- Kristian.