maria-developers team mailing list archive
-
maria-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04716
Re: MDEV-225: Replace with dummy events an event that is not understood by a slave to which it should be sent
Hi!
>>>>> "Kristian" == Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
<cut>
>> Also: Why would "a later release of a slave change what an earlier
>> release of a master believes about its capabilities"?
Kristian> Agree this is unclear. The basic idea is just to argue that it is better that
Kristian> the slave announces its capabilities explicitly rather than the master tries
Kristian> to guess based on version.
Agree 100 %. We should not do any guesses about capabilites based on
version numbers (if possible)!
<cut>
Kristian> And STRING_WITH_LEN(...) expands to two expressions with a comma between them
Kristian> UUU, VVV - so I also cannot put DBUG_EVALUATE_IF() around STRING_WITH_LEN().
Kristian> I rewrote it to use strlen() instead of STRING_WITH_LEN - this code is not
Kristian> performance critical:
I prefer to get rid of strlen() at all.
Jani has a long going task to go trough the server and remove all
strlen() adding a strlen() will cause more work for him sooner or
later...
Regards,
Monty
Follow ups
References