maria-developers team mailing list archive

[Sergei Golubchik <serg@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, Alexander!

On May 29, Alexander Barkov wrote:
> 
> I still think that we should rely only on the range
> and should not check the fractional part.
... 
> If the non-zero fractional part fits into 6 digits,
> it considers the fractional part as microseconds.
> 
> If the leading 6 fractional digits are zeros and there are some
> non-zeros in the 7th position, it works differently and obviously
> breaks the rule "treat as TIME if there is a fractional part".
> 
> With floating point numbers it gets even more confusing to rely on the
> fractional part, because "fractional part is zero" is a very
> non-precise fact.

Okay, let's change it :)

Regards,
Sergei