Hi Sanja,
yes, it is not a requirement to use true/false in C++.
I'd be Ok about my_bool if not one glitch: it can evaluate to anything that
char can evaluate to. C99 bool behaves more as expected:
<quot>
_Bool (also accessible as the macro bool) - type, capable of holding one of the
two values: 1 and 0 (also accessible as the macros true and false). Note that
conversion to _Bool does not work the same as conversion to other integer types:
(bool)0.5 evaluates to 1, whereas (int)0.5 evaluates to 0.
</quot>
I'd vote for bool/true/false everywhere if I were sure about it's portability
and about sizeof(_Bool) stability.
