maria-developers team mailing list archive
-
maria-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08726
Re: MDEV-8214 Asian MB2 charsets: compare broken bytes as "greater than any non-broken character"
Hi, Alexander!
On May 25, Alexander Barkov wrote:
> Hi Sergei,
>
> For simplicity I decided to split:
>
> MDEV-8036 Fix all collations to compare broken bytes as "greater than
> any non-broken character"
>
> into sub-tasks.
>
> Please review a patch for the first sub-task MDEV-8214.
I don't know why you wanted me to review it :)
Looks pretty ok. Of course there were few comments and questions, but
nothing serious.
> diff --git a/strings/ctype-big5.c b/strings/ctype-big5.c
> index eda81c0..aa06a7a 100644
> --- a/strings/ctype-big5.c
> +++ b/strings/ctype-big5.c
> @@ -6853,11 +6771,29 @@ my_mb_wc_big5(CHARSET_INFO *cs __attribute__((unused)),
> }
>
>
> -static MY_COLLATION_HANDLER my_collation_big5_chinese_ci_handler =
> +#undef MY_FUNCTION_NAME
> +#undef WEIGHT_MB1
> +#undef WEIGHT_MB2
why do you start from undef-ing macros that couldn't be defined here?
> +#define MY_FUNCTION_NAME(x) my_ ## x ## _big5_chinese_ci
> +#define WEIGHT_MB1(x) (sort_order_big5[(uchar) (x)])
> +#define WEIGHT_MB2(x,y) (big5code(x, y))
> +#include "ctype-strcoll.ic"
> +
> +
> +#undef MY_FUNCTION_NAME
> +#undef WEIGHT_MB1
> +#undef WEIGHT_MB2
alternatively you could undef them at the end of ctype-strcoll.ic
it'll also be a protection against including this file twice
(although it cannot be done now anyway)
> +#define MY_FUNCTION_NAME(x) my_ ## x ## _big5_bin
> +#define WEIGHT_MB1(x) ((uchar) (x))
> +#define WEIGHT_MB2(x,y) (big5code(x, y))
> +#include "ctype-strcoll.ic"
> +
> +
> +static MY_COLLATION_HANDLER my_collation_handler_big5_chinese_ci=
> {
> NULL, /* init */
> - my_strnncoll_big5,
> - my_strnncollsp_big5,
> + my_strnncoll_big5_chinese_ci,
> + my_strnncollsp_big5_chinese_ci,
> my_strnxfrm_big5,
> my_strnxfrmlen_simple,
> my_like_range_mb,
> diff --git a/strings/ctype-euc_kr.c b/strings/ctype-euc_kr.c
> index a2c95bf..db47b3d 100644
> --- a/strings/ctype-euc_kr.c
> +++ b/strings/ctype-euc_kr.c
> @@ -9938,21 +9940,56 @@ my_mb_wc_euc_kr(CHARSET_INFO *cs __attribute__((unused)),
> }
>
>
> -static MY_COLLATION_HANDLER my_collation_ci_handler =
> +#undef MY_FUNCTION_NAME
> +#undef WEIGHT_MB1
> +#undef WEIGHT_MB2
> +#define MY_FUNCTION_NAME(x) my_ ## x ## _euckr_korean_ci
> +#define WEIGHT_MB1(x) (sort_order_euc_kr[(uchar) (x)])
> +#define WEIGHT_MB2(x,y) (euckrcode(x, y))
> +#include "ctype-strcoll.ic"
> +
> +
> +#undef MY_FUNCTION_NAME
> +#undef WEIGHT_MB1
> +#undef WEIGHT_MB2
> +#define MY_FUNCTION_NAME(x) my_ ## x ## _euckr_bin
> +#define WEIGHT_MB1(x) ((uchar) (x))
> +#define WEIGHT_MB2(x,y) (euckrcode(x, y))
> +#include "ctype-strcoll.ic"
> +
> +
> +static MY_COLLATION_HANDLER my_collation_handler_euckr_korean_ci=
> {
> - NULL, /* init */
> - my_strnncoll_simple, /* strnncoll */
> - my_strnncollsp_simple,
> - my_strnxfrm_mb, /* strnxfrm */
> + NULL, /* init */
> + my_strnncoll_euckr_korean_ci,
> + my_strnncollsp_euckr_korean_ci,
hmm, so is euckr multi-byte or not?
wikipedia says it is, my_strnxfrm_mb.
but why my_strnncoll_simple?
> + my_strnxfrm_mb,
> my_strnxfrmlen_simple,
> - my_like_range_mb, /* like_range */
> - my_wildcmp_mb, /* wildcmp */
> + my_like_range_mb,
> + my_wildcmp_mb,
> my_strcasecmp_mb,
> my_instr_mb,
> my_hash_sort_simple,
> my_propagate_simple
> };
>
> +
> +static MY_COLLATION_HANDLER my_collation_handler_euckr_bin=
> +{
> + NULL, /* init */
> + my_strnncoll_euckr_bin,
> + my_strnncollsp_euckr_bin,
> + my_strnxfrm_mb,
> + my_strnxfrmlen_simple,
> + my_like_range_mb,
> + my_wildcmp_mb_bin,
> + my_strcasecmp_mb_bin,
> + my_instr_mb,
> + my_hash_sort_mb_bin,
> + my_propagate_simple
> +};
> +
> +
> static MY_CHARSET_HANDLER my_charset_handler=
> {
> NULL, /* init */
> diff --git a/strings/ctype-strcoll.ic b/strings/ctype-strcoll.ic
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7217f99
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/strings/ctype-strcoll.ic
> @@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
> +/*
> + Copyright (c) 2015, MariaDB Foundation
> +
> + This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
> +
> + This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + GNU General Public License for more details.
> +
> + You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> +*/
> +
> +
> +#ifndef MY_FUNCTION_NAME
> +#error MY_FUNCTION_NAME is not defined
> +#endif
> +
> +
> +/*
> + The weight for automatically padded spaces when comparing strings with
> + the PAD SPACE property.
> + Should normally be equal to the weight of a regular space.
it is not a space for sjis and cp932? what does that mean?
padding space is not the same as a regular space? why?
> +*/
> +#ifndef WEIGHT_PAD_SPACE
> +#define WEIGHT_PAD_SPACE (' ')
> +#endif
> +
> +
> +/*
> + Weight of an illegal byte.
> + Must be greater than weight of any normal character.
> + Two bad bytes are compared binary.
> +*/
> +#ifndef WEIGHT_ILSEQ
why #ifndef? it creates an impression that the caller (includer :)
can redefine it. better define WEIGHT_ILSEQ here unconditionally
and undefine it at the end
> +#define WEIGHT_ILSEQ(x) (0xFF00 + (x))
> +#endif
> +
> +
> +/**
> + Scan a valid character, or a bad byte, or an auto-padded space
> + from a string and calculate the weight of the scanned sequence.
> +
> + @param [OUT] weight - the weight is returned here
> + @param str - the string
> + @param end - the end of the string
> + @return - the number of bytes scanned
> +
> + The including source file must define the following macros:
> + IS_MB1_CHAR(x)
> + IS_MB2_CHAR(x,y)
> + WEIGHT_PAD_SPACE
> + WEIGHT_MB1(x)
> + WEIGHT_MB2(x,y)
> + WEIGHT_ILSEQ(x)
> +*/
> +static inline uint
> +MY_FUNCTION_NAME(scan_weight)(int *weight, const uchar *str, const uchar *end)
> +{
> + if (str >= end)
> + {
> + *weight= WEIGHT_PAD_SPACE;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (IS_MB1_CHAR(*str))
> + {
> + *weight= WEIGHT_MB1(*str); /* A valid single byte character*/
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (str + 2 > end) /* The string ended unexpectedly */
> + goto bad; /* Treat as a bad byte */
> +
> + if (IS_MB2_CHAR(str[0], str[1]))
> + {
> + *weight= WEIGHT_MB2(str[0], str[1]);
> + return 2; /* A valid two-byte character */
> + }
> +
> +bad:
> + *weight= WEIGHT_ILSEQ(str[0]); /* Bad byte */
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> +
> +/**
> + Compare two strings according to the collation,
> + without handling the PAD SPACE property.
> +
> + Note, cs->coll->strnncoll() is usually used to compare identifiers.
> + Perhaps we should eventually (in 10.2?) create a new collation
> + my_charset_utf8_general_ci_no_pad and have only one comparison function
> + in MY_COLLATION_HANDLER.
> +
> + @param cs - the character set and collation
> + @param a - the left string
> + @param a_length - the length of the left string
> + @param b - the right string
> + @param b_length - the length of the right string
> + @param b_is_prefix - if the caller wants to check if "b" is a prefix of "a"
> + @return - the comparison result
> +*/
> +static int
> +MY_FUNCTION_NAME(strnncoll)(CHARSET_INFO *cs __attribute__((unused)),
> + const uchar *a, size_t a_length,
> + const uchar *b, size_t b_length,
> + my_bool b_is_prefix)
> +{
> + const uchar *a_end= a + a_length;
> + const uchar *b_end= b + b_length;
> + for ( ; ; )
> + {
> + int a_weight, b_weight, res;
> + uint a_wlen= MY_FUNCTION_NAME(scan_weight)(&a_weight, a, a_end);
> + uint b_wlen= MY_FUNCTION_NAME(scan_weight)(&b_weight, b, b_end);
> + /*
> + a_wlen b_wlen Comment
> + ------ ------ -------
> + 0 0 Strings ended simultaneously, "a" and "b" are equal.
> + 0 >0 "a" is a prefix of "b", so "a" is smaller.
> + >0 0 "b" is a prefix of "a", check b_is_prefix.
> + >0 >0 Two weights were scanned, check weight difference.
> + */
> + if (!a_wlen)
> + return b_wlen ? -b_weight : 0;
can weight be negative? if not, the code will be clearer if you declare it unsigned
> +
> + if (!b_wlen)
> + return b_is_prefix ? 0 : a_weight;
> +
> + if ((res= (a_weight - b_weight)))
> + return res;
> + /*
> + None of the strings has ended yet.
> + */
> + DBUG_ASSERT(a < a_end);
> + DBUG_ASSERT(b < b_end);
> + a+= a_wlen;
> + b+= b_wlen;
> + }
> + DBUG_ASSERT(0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> +/**
> + Compare two strings according to the collation, with PAD SPACE handling.
> +
> + @param cs - the character set and collation
> + @param a - the left string
> + @param a_length - the length of the left string
> + @param b - the right string
> + @param b_length - the length of the right string
> + @param diff_if_only_endspace_difference - not used in the code.
> + TODO: this should be eventually removed (in 10.2?)
why not now (in a separate changeset, but in 10.1 still)?
> + @return - the comparison result
> +*/
> +
> +static int
> +MY_FUNCTION_NAME(strnncollsp)(CHARSET_INFO *cs __attribute__((unused)),
> + const uchar *a, size_t a_length,
> + const uchar *b, size_t b_length,
> + my_bool diff_if_only_endspace_difference
> + __attribute__((unused)))
> +{
> + const uchar *a_end= a + a_length;
> + const uchar *b_end= b + b_length;
> + for ( ; ; )
> + {
> + int a_weight, b_weight, res;
> + uint a_wlen= MY_FUNCTION_NAME(scan_weight)(&a_weight, a, a_end);
> + uint b_wlen= MY_FUNCTION_NAME(scan_weight)(&b_weight, b, b_end);
> + if ((res= (a_weight - b_weight)))
> + {
> + /*
> + Got two different weights. Each weight can be generated by either of:
> + - a real character
> + - a bad byte sequence or an incomplete byte sequence
> + - an auto-generated trailing space (PAD SPACE)
> + It does not matter how exactly each weight was generated.
> + Just return the weight difference.
> + */
> + return res;
> + }
> + if (!a_wlen && !b_wlen)
> + {
> + /*
> + Got two auto-generated trailing spaces, i.e.
> + both strings have now ended, so they are equal.
> + */
> + DBUG_ASSERT(a == a_end);
> + DBUG_ASSERT(b == b_end);
> + return 0;
> + }
> + /*
> + At least one of the strings has not ended yet, continue comparison.
> + */
> + DBUG_ASSERT(a < a_end || b < b_end);
> + a+= a_wlen;
> + b+= b_wlen;
> + }
> + DBUG_ASSERT(0);
> + return 0;
> +}
Regards,
Sergei
Follow ups
References