maria-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: On the issue of Seconds_behind_master and Parallel Replication
Insightful explanation, thank you.
On 10/15/15 08:16, Kristian Nielsen wrote:
So any opinions on this?
This is /my/ opinion, not discussed with other Booking.com people.
- Should Seconds_Behind_Master be changed as per above in parallel
replication (from 10.0 on)?
Yes, I think so ... or at least /optionally/ so.
Alternatively, add new variable (perhaps something like
SECONDS_BEHIND_COMMITTED) and leave the existing behavior as-is.
- If not, any suggestion for another semantics for Seconds_Behind_Master in
- If so, should the change to Seconds_Behind_Master also be done in the
non-parallel case in 10.1? What about 10.0?
If we stick with one variable, can the behavior be easily made to be
configurable? If so, then DBAs could decide which makes more sense in
http://www.freesa.org/ -- mobile: +31 620719662
aim: ericigps -- skype: eric_herman -- jabber: eric.herman@xxxxxxxxx