maria-developers team mailing list archive

[Eric Herman <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Insightful explanation, thank you.

On 10/15/15 08:16, Kristian Nielsen wrote:

> So any opinions on this?

This is /my/ opinion, not discussed with other Booking.com people.

>   - Should Seconds_Behind_Master be changed as per above in parallel
>     replication (from 10.0 on)?

Yes, I think so ... or at least /optionally/ so.

Alternatively, add new variable (perhaps something like 
SECONDS_BEHIND_COMMITTED) and leave the existing behavior as-is.

>   - If not, any suggestion for another semantics for Seconds_Behind_Master in
>     parallel replication?
>
>   - If so, should the change to Seconds_Behind_Master also be done in the
>     non-parallel case in 10.1? What about 10.0?

If we stick with one variable, can the behavior be easily made to be 
configurable? If so, then DBAs could decide which makes more sense in 
their environment.


Cheers,
 -Eric


--
http://www.freesa.org/ -- mobile: +31 620719662
aim: ericigps -- skype: eric_herman -- jabber: eric.herman@xxxxxxxxx