I'd like your opinion about this difference in the result of the null.test:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- /home/hf/wgit/cmt-mdev-9143/mysql-test/r/null.result 2016-10-23
13:33:54.050093010 +0400
+++ /home/hf/wgit/cmt-mdev-9143/mysql-test/r/null.reject 2016-10-24
17:31:55.553248271 +0400
@@ -1584,7 +1584,7 @@
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len
ref rows filtered Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 3
100.00 Using where
Warnings:
-Note 1003 select `test`.`t1`.`c1` AS `c1` from `test`.`t1`
where (((`test`.`t1`.`c1` is not null) >= <cache>((not(1)))) is not
null)
+Note 1003 select `test`.`t1`.`c1` AS `c1` from `test`.`t1`
where (((`test`.`t1`.`c1` is not null) >= 0) is not null)
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE ((c1 IS NOT NULL) >= (NOT TRUE)) IS NOT NULL;
c1
1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean i made a change in the code that changed the test result,
which is normally not good.
Though i think here we rather have an improvement.
What do you think? Would you approve that change in the result?
See below for the patch that caused all this:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/sql/item.cc b/sql/item.cc
index 448e34b..2388679 100644
--- a/sql/item.cc
+++ b/sql/item.cc
@@ -2900,6 +2900,14 @@ void Item_int::print(String *str,
enum_query_type query_type)
}
+Item *Item_bool::neg_transformer(THD *thd)
+{
+ value= !value;
+ name= 0;
+ return this;
+}
+
+
Item_uint::Item_uint(THD *thd, const char *str_arg, uint length):
Item_int(thd, str_arg, length)
{
diff --git a/sql/item.h b/sql/item.h
index 7644235..ab70fdb 100644
--- a/sql/item.h
+++ b/sql/item.h
@@ -3008,6 +3008,7 @@ class Item_bool :public Item_int
Item_bool(THD *thd, const char *str_arg, longlong i):
Item_int(thd, str_arg, i, 1) {}
bool is_bool_type() { return true; }
+ Item *neg_transformer(THD *thd);
};
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Best regards.
HF