maria-developers team mailing list archive
-
maria-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #10044
Re: MDEV-7660 MySQL WL#6671 "Improve scalability by not using thr_lock.c locks for InnoDB tables"
Hi, Sergey!
Just one comment:
On Oct 18, Sergey Vojtovich wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/mysql-test/r/lock_tables_lost_commit.result b/mysql-test/r/lock_tables_lost_commit.result
> > > > > index 769e973..394ef0a 100644
> > > > > --- a/mysql-test/r/lock_tables_lost_commit.result
> > > > > +++ b/mysql-test/r/lock_tables_lost_commit.result
> > > > > @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ disconnect con1;
> > > > > connection con2;
> > > > > SELECT * FROM t1;
> > > > > a
> > > > > -10
> > > >
> > > > This test doesn't make sense after your fix. and the original bug#578
> > > > reappears. The problem is that mysqlimport issues LOCK TABLES,
> > > > but does not issue UNLOCK TABLES at the end. I suspect
> > > > this has to be fixed now.
> > > >
> > > > Alternatively, you can make LOCK TABLE to commit (not rollback)
> > > > a transaction at disconnect. But that would be weird, wouldn't it?
> > > This change is in new patch too.
> > >
> > > You're right, we should fix mysqlimport. I just wonder why this trivial fix
> > > wasn't introduced before?
> >
> > Will you do it as a part of MDEV-7660?
> Better not.
Could you make an MDEV for that? Type=Bug, FixVersion=10.2.
Otherwise all ok, I think.
Regards,
Sergei
Chief Architect MariaDB
and security@xxxxxxxxxxx
References