maria-developers team mailing list archive
-
maria-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #11211
Re: a74e3ef17e7: MDEV-14551 Can't find record in table on multi-table update with ORDER BY
Hi, Sergey!
On Apr 12, Sergey Petrunia wrote:
> > diff --git a/sql/item_strfunc.h b/sql/item_strfunc.h
> > index 18cda491efd..49de5568696 100644
> > --- a/sql/item_strfunc.h
> > +++ b/sql/item_strfunc.h
> > @@ -1748,5 +1748,20 @@ class Item_func_dyncol_list: public Item_str_func
> > { return get_item_copy<Item_func_dyncol_list>(thd, this); }
> > };
> >
> > -#endif /* ITEM_STRFUNC_INCLUDED */
>
> Please add a note that this is not the "_rowid" that we support in the parser.
I used the terminology that you introduced, that is
"keep_current_rowid".
But if you don't mind, I'd rather rename keep_current_rowid (and
every "rowid" that I introduced) to keep_current_position (because it's
handler::position()) or keep_current_ref (because it's handler::ref and
handler::ref_length), whichever is less ambiguous.
Regards,
Sergei
Chief Architect MariaDB
and security@xxxxxxxxxxx
Follow ups
References