maria-developers team mailing list archive

[Sergei Golubchik <serg@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi, Jan!

On Oct 06, Jan Lindström wrote:
> >
> > > > > +/* This is wrapper for wsrep_break_lock in thr_lock.c */
> > > > > +static int wsrep_thr_abort_thd(void *bf_thd_ptr, void *victim_thd_ptr, my_bool signal)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +  THD* victim_thd= (THD *) victim_thd_ptr;
> > > > > +  /* We need to lock THD::LOCK_thd_data to protect victim
> > > > > +  from concurrent usage or disconnect or delete. */
> > > >
> > > > How do you know victim_thd wasn't deleted before you locked
> > > > LOCK_thd_data below?
> > >
> > > I must say the thr_lock code is not familiar to me but there are
> > > mysql_mutex_lock() calls to lock->mutex. After code review  it is not
> > > clear to me what that mutex is.
> >
> > where are mysql_mutex_lock() calls to lock->mutex?
> 
> mysys/thr_lock.c there is function thr_lock() there is call to
> mysql_mutex_lock(&lock->mutex); this is before wsrep_break_lock where we
> call wsrep_thd_abort

this is for table locks. `lock` is `data->lock` where `data` is THR_LOCK
structure somewhere in the table share. It locks tables and handlers,
not threads. And InnoDB isn't using it at all anyway.

> 
> > > > >          if (victim_trx) {
> > > > > +                wsrep_thd_UNLOCK(victim_thd);
> > > >
> > > > what keeps victim_trx from disappearing here?
> > >
> > > Nothing. Do you have suggestions ?
> >
> > A couple of thoughts:
> >
> > * Why do you unlock LOCK_thd_data here at all? I believed the whole
> > point of using TOI was to make sure that even if you lock mutexes in
> > a different order, it will not cause a deadlock.
> 
> This is DDL-case when we have a MDL-conflict not user KILL, we need to
> release it in my opinion because we need to take mutexes in
> lock_sys -> trx -> THD::LOCK_thd_data order,
> if I do not release I can see easily safe_mutex warnings

I don't understand. First, lock_sys and trx mutexes are not covered by
safe_mutex, so it cannot possibly warn about them.

Second, the reason for taking mutexes always in the same order is to
avoid deadlocks. And yor TOI trick should archieve that.

> > * You cannot pass a THD safely over a gap where no locks keep it in
> > existence. You can pass an integer, thread id, and use
> > find_thread_by_id later.
> 
> I have a suggestion for this:
> 
>          if (victim_trx) {
> +
> +               const trx_id_t victim_trx_id= victim_trx->id;
> +               const longlong victim_thread= thd_get_thread_id(victim_thd);
>                 lock_mutex_enter();
> -               trx_mutex_enter(victim_trx);
> -               wsrep_innobase_kill_one_trx(bf_thd, bf_trx, victim_trx, signal);
> +               if (trx_t* victim= trx_rw_is_active(victim_trx_id, NULL, true)) // If this succeeds, trx can not go away
> +               {
> +                       trx_mutex_enter(victim);
> +                       ut_ad(victim->mysql_thd ?
> +                               thd_get_thread_id(victim->mysql_thd) == victim_thread :
> +                               1);
> +                       wsrep_innobase_kill_one_trx(bf_thd, bf_trx, victim, signal);
> +                       trx_mutex_exit(victim);
> +                       victim->release_reference(); // Now trx can go away after we have released lock_sys
> +                       wsrep_srv_conc_cancel_wait(victim);
> +               }
>                 lock_mutex_exit();
> -               trx_mutex_exit(victim_trx);
> -               wsrep_srv_conc_cancel_wait(victim_trx);
>                 DBUG_VOID_RETURN;

I don't understand, sorry. It's not quite clear what this patch should
apply to. May be you can paste what the new code should look like, not a
patch?

In particular, where are wsrep_thd_UNLOCK and wsrep_thd_LOCK. Are they
present in this new variant at all?

> 
> > By the way, how long can WSREP_TO_ISOLATION_BEGIN() take?
> > Does it need to wait for everything else being replicated?
> 
> As long as it takes to start it on all nodes in the cluster.

So, KILL basically won't work when a cluster is starting.
Can bf aborts happen during a cluster startup?

Regards,
Sergei
VP of MariaDB Server Engineering
and security@xxxxxxxxxxx