maria-developers team mailing list archive
-
maria-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #13136
Re: 96b40a5e2f5: MDEV-27744 InnoDB: Failing assertion: !cursor->index->is_committed() in row0ins.cc (from row_ins_sec_index_entry_by_modify) | Assertion `0' failed in row_upd_sec_index_entry (debug) | Corruption
Hi, Alexander,
Some comments/questions here. I'll need to look at the patch again after
I understand why you did it this way better.
On Apr 18, Alexander Barkov wrote:
> revision-id: 96b40a5e2f5 (mariadb-10.3.33-61-g96b40a5e2f5)
> parent(s): 7355f7b1f5c
> author: Alexander Barkov
> committer: Alexander Barkov
> timestamp: 2022-04-07 16:22:17 +0400
> message:
>
> MDEV-27744 InnoDB: Failing assertion: !cursor->index->is_committed() in row0ins.cc (from row_ins_sec_index_entry_by_modify) | Assertion `0' failed in row_upd_sec_index_entry (debug) | Corruption
A detailed comment here is a must.
What was the problem, how it was fixed.
> diff --git a/sql/item_func.h b/sql/item_func.h
> index 754b1cd1eb2..d844e45280a 100644
> --- a/sql/item_func.h
> +++ b/sql/item_func.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,36 @@ extern "C" /* Bug in BSDI include file */
> #include <cmath>
>
>
> +template<class FUNC>
> +FUNC* item_func_create_2_3_args(THD *thd, const LEX_CSTRING &name,
> + List<Item> *item_list)
> +{
> + int arg_count= item_list ? item_list->elements : 0;
> +
> + switch (arg_count) {
> + case 2:
> + {
> + Item *param_1= item_list->pop();
> + Item *param_2= item_list->pop();
> + return new (get_thd_memroot(thd)) FUNC(thd, param_1, param_2);
> + }
> + case 3:
> + {
> + Item *param_1= item_list->pop();
> + Item *param_2= item_list->pop();
> + Item *param_3= item_list->pop();
> + return new (get_thd_memroot(thd)) FUNC(thd, param_1, param_2, param_3);
A constructor that takes a List<Item> wouldn't need a switch.
And wouldn't need a template either, your create_check_args_ge()
isn't a template.
> + break;
> + }
> + default:
> + my_error(ER_WRONG_PARAMCOUNT_TO_NATIVE_FCT, MYF(0), name.str);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +
> class Item_func :public Item_func_or_sum
> {
> void sync_with_sum_func_and_with_field(List<Item> &list);
> @@ -56,8 +86,41 @@ class Item_func :public Item_func_or_sum
> bool check_argument_types_can_return_text(uint start, uint end) const;
> bool check_argument_types_can_return_date(uint start, uint end) const;
> bool check_argument_types_can_return_time(uint start, uint end) const;
> +
> + void print_schema_name_if_needed(String *to) const
> + {
> + const LEX_CSTRING schema_name= schema_name_cstring();
> + if (schema_name.length)
> + {
> + to->append(schema_name);
> + to->append('.');
> + }
this should check that schema_name isn't the same as the
schema in the path (implicit path, assumed by the current sql_mode).
> + }
> + void print_maybe_qualified_name(String *to) const
> + {
> + print_schema_name_if_needed(to);
> + to->append(func_name());
> + }
> +
> public:
>
> + // Print an error message for a builtin-schema qualified function call
> + static void wrong_param_count_error(const LEX_CSTRING &schema_name,
> + const LEX_CSTRING &func_name);
> +
> + // Check that the number of arguments is greater or equal to "expected"
> + static bool create_check_args_ge(const LEX_CSTRING &name,
> + const List<Item> *item_list,
> + uint expected)
> + {
> + if (!item_list || item_list->elements < expected)
> + {
> + my_error(ER_WRONG_PARAMCOUNT_TO_NATIVE_FCT, MYF(0), name.str);
what's the point of your wrong_param_count_error() if you aren't using it?
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> table_map not_null_tables_cache;
>
> enum Functype { UNKNOWN_FUNC,EQ_FUNC,EQUAL_FUNC,NE_FUNC,LT_FUNC,LE_FUNC,
> diff --git a/sql/item_strfunc.cc b/sql/item_strfunc.cc
> index 75abd9906cd..e45fe6ef6d7 100644
> --- a/sql/item_strfunc.cc
> +++ b/sql/item_strfunc.cc
> @@ -3204,6 +3239,39 @@ static String *default_pad_str(String *pad_str, CHARSET_INFO *collation)
> return pad_str;
> }
>
> +
> +Item_func_lpad*
> +Item_func_lpad::create(THD *thd, const LEX_CSTRING &name,
> + List<Item> *item_list)
> +{
> + return item_func_create_2_3_args<Item_func_lpad>(thd, name, item_list);
may be item_func_create_2_3_args should be in Item_func?
Like create_check_args_ge() is?
and may be create_check_args_ge() should be a template too?
> +}
> +
> +
> +Item_func_lpad_oracle*
> +Item_func_lpad_oracle::create(THD *thd, const LEX_CSTRING &name,
> + List<Item> *item_list)
> +{
> + return item_func_create_2_3_args<Item_func_lpad_oracle>(thd, name, item_list);
> +}
> +
> +
> +Item_func_rpad*
> +Item_func_rpad::create(THD *thd, const LEX_CSTRING &name,
> + List<Item> *item_list)
> +{
> + return item_func_create_2_3_args<Item_func_rpad>(thd, name, item_list);
> +}
> +
> +
> +Item_func_rpad_oracle*
> +Item_func_rpad_oracle::create(THD *thd, const LEX_CSTRING &name,
> + List<Item> *item_list)
> +{
> + return item_func_create_2_3_args<Item_func_rpad_oracle>(thd, name, item_list);
> +}
> +
> +
> bool Item_func_pad::fix_length_and_dec()
> {
> if (arg_count == 3)
> diff --git a/sql/sql_lex.cc b/sql/sql_lex.cc
> index 7f1b362d91d..6b0a351f76e 100644
> --- a/sql/sql_lex.cc
> +++ b/sql/sql_lex.cc
> @@ -1542,7 +1541,18 @@ int Lex_input_stream::lex_one_token(YYSTYPE *yylval, THD *thd)
> if (lex->parsing_options.lookup_keywords_after_qualifier)
> next_state= MY_LEX_IDENT_OR_KEYWORD;
> else
> - next_state= MY_LEX_IDENT_START; // Next is ident (not keyword)
> + {
> + /*
> + Next is:
> + - A qualified func with a special syntax:
> + mariadb_schema.REPLACE('a','b','c')
> + mariadb_schema.SUSTRING('a',1,2)
> + mariadb_schema.TRIM('a')
> + - Or an identifier otherwise. No keyword lookup is done,
> + all keywords are treated as identifiers.
> + */
> + next_state= MY_LEX_IDENT_OR_QUALIFIED_SPECIAL_FUNC;
I don't understand why you did it in the lexer and not in the parser, like
- | REPLACE '(' expr ',' expr ',' expr ')'
+ | opt_schema REPLACE '(' expr ',' expr ',' expr ')'
or (if the above won't work in LARL(1) parser)
- | ident_cli '.' ident_cli '(' opt_expr_list ')'
+ | ident_cli '.' func_2nd_part
with
+ func_2nd_part: ident_cli '(' opt_expr_list ')'
+ | REPLACE '(' expr ',' expr ',' expr ')'
etc
(not reviewing lexer changes anymore, until I understand the above)
> + }
> if (!ident_map[(uchar) yyPeek()]) // Probably ` or "
> next_state= MY_LEX_START;
> return((int) c);
Regards,
Sergei
VP of MariaDB Server Engineering
and security@xxxxxxxxxxx
Follow ups