maria-discuss team mailing list archive
-
maria-discuss team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00464
Re: [Maria-developers] Microseconds support in MariaDB 5.3.
That is fine then! Only a little confusing thing is that as far as I know
TIMESTAMP(14) is supported in MySQL 5.1 (and abandoned in MySQL 5.5) - so
probably still in MariaDB as well. So maybe N should rather have been 17 or
20 (the byte length)?
-- Peter
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 16:39, Philip Stoev <pstoev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> By default, the existing precision is used. Only if a column is defined as
> TIME|TIMESTAMP(N) with N being either 3 or 6 , then millisecond or
> microsecond precision will be used.
>
> Philip Stoev
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Laursen" <
> peter_laursen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> To: <maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <
> maria-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 5:33 PM
> Subject: [Maria-developers] Microseconds support in MariaDB 5.3.
>
>
>
> I noticed: http://askmonty.org/blog/the-2-year-old-mariadb/ "The support
>> for
>> microseconds in TIMESTAMP, DATETIME, and TIME".
>>
>> I fully agree the 'full seconds support only' has been a sever limitation
>> in
>> MySQL. But I have two concerns with ths:
>>
>> 1)
>> 'noisyness'. On not very fast systems the last digits of a TIME in
>> microseconds should not be considered too much important. It depends on
>> what else the system is doing at the time. I think for lots of users
>> milliseconds and not microseconds would be better/more relevant. It is
>> not
>> always a lot of digits can be proven true. When we went to school we were
>> all taught not to present results in natural sciences more accurate than
>> the
>> accuracy of data sources and measurements. Providing too many digits in a
>> resuslt actually caused a lower score in my highschool!
>>
>> 2)
>> Compability. There is a problem with UPDATES. A client/application
>> written
>> for MySQL may assume 'full seconds support only' and may generate the
>> current MySQL format byte format in the WHERE clause (typically if the
>> client reserves a 14 byte buffer for TIMERSTAMPS etc). In SQL:
>>
>> UPDATE table SET column = 'something' WHERE time_column = '01:01:01':
>> .. this update will fail if the currently stored value is
>> '01:01:01:010001'; and the rigth query in the context would be.
>> UPDATE table SET column = 'something' WHERE time_column =
>> '01:01:01:010001';
>>
>>
>> Ideally I think there should be a configuration parameter and a global
>> variable to SET time_accuracy = full_second|millisecond|microsecond.
>>
>>
>> Did somebody have considerations about same? I definitely think that lots
>> of
>> applications using a TIME|TIMESTAMP|DATETIME column in the WHERE-clause of
>> an UPDATE statement will need some rewrite to be upgradable to MariaDB 5.3
>>
>>
>> -- Peter
>>
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
>> Post to : maria-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>
Follow ups
References