maria-discuss team mailing list archive

[Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Sergei!
I was reading the patch, in messages inside lauchpad there's a benchmark
showing a better performace with version 3.1 of jemalloc, but at mariadb
5.5 we are using 3.3 (if i'm not wrong)
I know it's a fresh new release of mariadb, we need time to know if it's
really better
Any idea why we are using 3.3 instead 3.1, or maybe why not the last
jemalloc version?

Thanks :)


2013/9/18 Sergei Golubchik <serg@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> Hi, Reindl!
>
> On Sep 18, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > well, recent is 3.4.0
> > however, the releas enotes are not really true
> > jemalloc not linked nor loaded
> >
> > https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-5533-release-notes/
> > Other Notable Information
> > MariaDB is now built with jemalloc by default on Linux
> >
> > [root@testserver:~]$ rpm -q --file /usr/libexec/mysqld
> > mariadb-server-5.5.33-6.fc19.20130917.rh.x86_64
>
> Where did you get it from?
> In the fedora19-update repo I only see mariadb-server-5.5.32.
>
> Anyway, jemalloc is bundled with the mariadb sources and is linked in
> statically:
>
> $ ldd sql/mysqld|grep jemalloc
> $ grep jemalloc sql/mysqld
> Binary file sql/mysqld matches
> $
>
> Regards,
> Sergei
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
> Post to     : maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>



-- 
Roberto Spadim
SPAEmpresarial