maria-discuss team mailing list archive

[MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@xxxxxxxxx>]

Why do you claim it wasn't GA ready? By MySQL standards I think it was very
stable early on. You can decide whether I am more or less biased than other
people making comments on this. Given that I have no experience with
something like Oracle, I am not sure that early Oracle releases for a new
major version are any better.


On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Colin Charles <byte@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Giuseppe Maxia asks some questions:
>
> http://datacharmer.blogspot.hk/2013/09/forking-mysql-for-how-long-can-forks.html
>
> The comments featuring Justin Swanhart and Stewart Smith make a lot of
> sense - 5.6 was GA, it wasn't a GA-ready product. Its getting there to some
> extent (as do all MySQL releases: 6-9 months from GA date)
>
> Feel free to comment on the blog post above
>
> cheers,
> -colin
>
> --
> Colin Charles, Chief Evangelist
> MariaDB | t: +6-012-204-3201 | Skype: colincharles
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
> Post to     : maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>



-- 
Mark Callaghan
mdcallag@xxxxxxxxx