maria-discuss team mailing list archive
-
maria-discuss team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01586
Re: Help with history tables
yes :) but that's a start point
index optimizations can be done with time
2014-05-21 20:36 GMT-03:00 Federico Razzoli <federico_raz@xxxxxxxx>:
> Maybe. But it cannot bet optimized. All the discarded rows must be read,
> before reaching the offset (and I suppose they're not in the buffer pool).
>
> Federico
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
> El jue, 22/5/14, Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
>
> Asunto: Re: [Maria-discuss] Help with history tables
> Para: "Federico Razzoli" <federico_raz@xxxxxxxx>
> CC: "Maria Discuss" <maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fecha: jueves, 22 de mayo, 2014 00:47
>
> anything
> like delete from history where channel_id=10 order by
> date_time desc limit 10000000000 offset 50000 ?i
> never checked offset at delete statment
>
>
> 2014-05-21 18:43 GMT-03:00
> Federico Razzoli <federico_raz@xxxxxxxx>:
>
> I would use a batch operation (a cron job or an SQL event)
> which is triggered when the workload is low. If the queries
> are still a problem, you could relax the 50000 limit and use
> a statistical method. For example you could periodically
> compute how many rows per day are inserted (globally if
> possible, otherwise for each channel). You could do this
> once a month, for example. In the meanwhile, based on the
> last calculated AVG, you can use faster DELETEs based on the
> DATE column. You can do further optimizations, like
> cleansing some channels on monday, others on tuesday, etc.
> Everything depends on your workload and the speed of your
> COUNT(*)s and DELETEs.
>
>
>
>
> Federico
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------
>
> El mié, 21/5/14, Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> escribió:
>
>
>
> Asunto: [Maria-discuss] Help with history tables
>
> Para: "Maria Discuss" <maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Fecha: miércoles, 21 de mayo, 2014 22:32
>
>
>
> Hi guysI have an
>
> doubt about design
>
> I have a history table:CREATE TABLE
>
> HISTORY(CHANNEL INT NOT NUL DEFAULT
>
> 0,HISTORY_DATE DECIMAL(22,6) NOT NULL DEFAULT
>
> '0' COMMENT 'UNIX
> TIME',
>
> VALUE DECIMAL (22,6) NOT NULL DEFAULT
>
> 0,PRIMARY KEY
>
> (CHANNEL,HISTORY_DATE))
>
> my question is...i need a history of
>
> only 50000 rows for each channelwhat's the
>
> best method to allow a good
> history without many deletes,
>
> analyse tables, and others stuffs to allow a good
> table/disk
>
> usage?
>
>
>
> i was considering a counter, for example, after
>
> 1000 inserts, run aSELECT COUNT(*) FROM HISTORY
>
> WHERE CHANNEL={channel_id}
>
> get this number of rows, if it's > 50000
>
> run:
>
>
>
> DELETE FROM HISTORY WHERE CHANNEL={channel_id}
>
> ORDER BY HISTORY_DATE ASC LIMIT (number_of_rows -
>
> 50000)
>
> any other idea?
>
> maybe a 'batch' operation?
>
> i was think about something like (don't work, just
>
> a idea)
>
> DELETE FROM HISTORY WHERE CHANNEL IN
>
> (channel numbers)AND xxxxx? LIMIT 50000 GROUP BY
>
> CHANNEL
>
>
>
> i don't know anything to group by channel id
>
> and delete rows using only one sql command , any idea?
>
>
>
>
>
> thanks guys!
>
> --
>
> Roberto Spadim
>
>
>
> SPAEmpresarialEng. Automação e Controle
>
>
>
> -----Adjunto en línea a continuación-----
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
>
> Post to : maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Roberto Spadim
> SPAEmpresarialEng. Automação e
> Controle
>
>
--
Roberto Spadim
SPAEmpresarial
Eng. Automação e Controle
References