maria-discuss team mailing list archive

[kentoku <kentokushiba@xxxxxxxxx>]

>> hi kentoku! i will try with mysql server
>> but i got one question, why mariadb don't support VP? is something
>> different that block using VP ?

It is need some changes for MariaDB.

> now i saw 10.0.9 at 'last' name, i will try it :)

Please use this for now.
source code
http://spiderformysql.com/downloads/spider-3.2/mariadb-10.0.13-spider-3.2-vp-1.1-mroonga-4.05a.tgz
binary for linux x86_64
http://spiderformysql.com/downloads/spider-3.2/mariadb-10.0.13-spider-3.2-vp-1.1-mroonga-4.05-linux-x86_64-glibc25a.tgz

Thanks,
Kentoku


2014-09-24 3:06 GMT+09:00 Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> https://launchpad.net/vpformysql/trunk/1.1-for-5.5.34-10.0.9/+download/vp-src-1.1-for-5.5.34-10.0.9.tgz
>
> now i saw 10.0.9 at 'last' name, i will try it :)
> news i post here
>
> 2014-09-23 14:54 GMT-03:00 Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> hi kentoku! i will try with mysql server
>> but i got one question, why mariadb don't support VP? is something
>> different that block using VP ?
>>
>> 2014-09-23 14:44 GMT-03:00 kentoku <kentokushiba@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> Hi Roberto,
>>>
>>> Thank you for testing VP.
>>> I'll think about this feature.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kentoku
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-09-21 18:10 GMT+09:00 Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> > Hi! Well i'm checking vp isn't part of mariadb today :/ maybe we should
>>> > port
>>> > it first and after jmplement new features, right?
>>> >
>>> > Em domingo, 21 de setembro de 2014, Oleksandr Byelkin
>>> > <sanja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi!
>>> >>
>>> >> On 21.09.14 05:06, Roberto Spadim wrote:
>>> >> [skip]
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> sounds crazy? :)
>>> >>> ok i know that query cache have some problems with mutex, but it's
>>> >>> another history we could have a better hit rate with this feature (at
>>> >>> least
>>> >>> when correctly used)
>>> >>> check that query cache become inconsistent if we change data1 or
>>> >>> data2
>>> >>> outside vp table
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> It is doable if put a lot of hooks of asking engine about tables.
>>> >>
>>> >> There is already hooks now used in table invalidation. But it works
>>> >> slowly
>>> >> (relatively) because having no open table difficult to give engine
>>> >> full
>>> >> information and so each such hook will cause semi-open process and so
>>> >> if we
>>> >> have miss it looks like double opening overhead.
>>> >>
>>> >> So, in price of total overhead we can make it, the question is if it
>>> >> help
>>> >> so much that gain will be more then overhead in average... As usual I
>>> >> have
>>> >> doubts about it (need a proof).
>>> >>
>>> >> [skip]
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Roberto Spadim
>>> > SPAEmpresarial
>>> > Eng. Automação e Controle
>>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Roberto Spadim
>> SPAEmpresarial
>> Eng. Automação e Controle
>
>
>
>
> --
> Roberto Spadim
> SPAEmpresarial
> Eng. Automação e Controle