maria-discuss team mailing list archive
-
maria-discuss team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02204
Re: The future of Dynamic Columns
-
To:
Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Tom Worster <fsb@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:54:45 -0500
-
Cc:
Maria Discuss <maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
In-reply-to:
<CAH3kUhE_07_aGWRwCgeHrYih1q9GrkxrUw2OyD2D3WrEnE=sbA@mail.gmail.com>
-
Thread-topic:
[Maria-discuss] The future of Dynamic Columns
-
User-agent:
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.7.141117
I'm going to respond to your previous two emails with a generality:
It is sometimes better to optimize the software development process than the
software's data processing.
If this were not true, I would not be using this ORM at all and nobody
should. But the converse is also clear: sometimes the layers of indirection
and abstraction that make the life of an application developer more
comfortable and productive are not appropriate for the reasons you
mentioned, among others. Knowing which of the many tools to choose is part
of being a carpenter.
References
-
The future of Dynamic Columns
From: Tom Worster, 2015-01-27
-
Re: The future of Dynamic Columns
From: Sergei Golubchik, 2015-01-28
-
Re: The future of Dynamic Columns
From: Tom Worster, 2015-01-28
-
Re: The future of Dynamic Columns
From: Roberto Spadim, 2015-01-28
-
Re: The future of Dynamic Columns
From: Peter Laursen, 2015-01-28
-
Re: The future of Dynamic Columns
From: Tom Worster, 2015-01-28
-
Re: The future of Dynamic Columns
From: Oleksandr Byelkin, 2015-01-28
-
Re: The future of Dynamic Columns
From: Tom Worster, 2015-01-29
-
Re: The future of Dynamic Columns
From: Oleksandr Byelkin, 2015-01-29
-
Re: The future of Dynamic Columns
From: Tom Worster, 2015-01-29
-
Re: The future of Dynamic Columns
From: Roberto Spadim, 2015-01-29