maria-discuss team mailing list archive
-
maria-discuss team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02695
Re: Upgrading mariadb-galera-server
-
To:
<maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Tom Worster <fsb@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:30:59 -0400
-
In-reply-to:
<CAC2Uqrs818BFaKYyFe-YDFucUUO5wKVh5pnmrWWMeT8Kh=wbXA@mail.gmail.com>
-
Thread-topic:
[Maria-discuss] Upgrading mariadb-galera-server
-
User-agent:
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.1.150515
Thanks Guillaume.
The doc says
> Unless you use Incremental State Transfer, as you bring each node back online
> after an upgrade, it initiates a full State Snapshot Transfer, which can take
> a long time to process on larger databases and slower state transfer methods.
The wording suggests that it's up to me to choose IST. But isn't it the case
that the server choses IST or SST, depending on whether galera.cache has
enough writesets for an IST?
From: Guillaume Lefranc <guillaume@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, June 19, 2015 at 1:22 PM
To: Tom Worster <fsb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: maria-discuss email list <maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Maria-discuss] Upgrading mariadb-galera-server
Yes.
http://galeracluster.com/documentation-webpages/upgrading.html
2015-06-19 18:55 GMT+02:00 Tom Worster <fsb@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Can I upgrade a production cluster from 10.0.15 to 10.0.19 while the cluster
> remains in service, upgrading one node at a time?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
> Post to : maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References