maria-discuss team mailing list archive

[Darin Keever <darin@xxxxxxxxx>]

Guillaume,

I believe that was the first approach, but there was some limitation.  I
thought it was insert/updates, but from the look of features, that is
available.  It probably would not take much to move over to connect, though
I know they have already developed quite a bit of tools based on the
current approach.

-Darin

On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 4:33 AM, Guillaume Lefranc <guillaume@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi Darin,
>
> Just curious, why didn't you consider the CONNECT engine?
>
> 2015-06-18 22:34 GMT+02:00 Darin Keever <darin@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> This is regarding:
>> https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb/about-federatedx/
>>
>> Specifically, the last section bullet
>>
>>    - Support for other RDBMS vendors using ODBC
>>
>>
>> My employer started a project to add a generic ODBC source to the
>> FederatedX plugin.  Once into the project, it was decided that creating a
>> specific source to our COM server would be faster.  The ODBC source did
>> work, but it was buttoned up after read-access was completed.  I'm not sure
>> if it will ever be released, but I thought we should distribute the code
>> regardless.
>>
>> Please find an incredibly boring page here:
>> http://stonebond.com/mariadb-contributions/
>>
>> Included in the zip are the changes to source files, as well as two
>> additional files for connecting to ODBC and to our COM dll.  These were
>> only compiled on windows, so likely are not ready for inclusion in the
>> source tree.
>>
>> Let me know if you have any questions.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
>> Post to     : maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>>
>