maria-discuss team mailing list archive
-
maria-discuss team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04013
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
Mariadb should understand the comparison between Myrocks and Tokudb, and
let their current users decide what should be in the product. It is their
product and their responsibility. Unfortunately, I am no longer working on
database software as my primary focus, so I can not make any significant
changes to the Tokudb software; it is what it is.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 6:32 PM, MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And if I sound annoyed when talking about TokuDB performance, I am a bit.
> I wish someone else documented the performance problems it has. The
> problems are known but not much has been shared to explain them. That has
> been left to me as I am promoting the other write-optimized storage engine
> for MySQL. A lot of extremely talented people worked on TokuDB. A few
> (hello Rich) continue to help with it. One of them is related to me (hello
> Tim). One of them works for my employer (Zardosht). I wish more of them
> worked for my employer (anon, anon, anon). Now I get to be the jerk.
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:51 PM, MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> If your workload is insert-only and you are happy with TokuDB then please
>> don't try to migrate. But most workloads have reads concurrent with writes.
>> Add that to insert benchmark and TokuDB becomes unhappy. Why do we always
>> get results for insert-only iibench but not for insert+query iibench? My
>> client supports it - https://github.com/mdcallag/
>> mytools/blob/master/bench/ibench/iibench.py
>>
>> I think insert-only iibench is a silly workload with results that are
>> usually taken out of context. MyRocks is great on it, with and without
>> concurrent queries. So I guess I am happy about that.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Reinis Rozitis <r@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> > I am not surprised that there are so few performance results published
>>> for TokuDB. And when they are published they are almost always for trivial
>>> workloads -- like insert-only insert benchmark. Try adding queries
>>> concurrent with the inserts.
>>>
>>> True but one can see also in your own comment (
>>> https://github.com/facebook/mysql-5.6/issues/25#issuecomment-218494710
>>> ) that some tests in different circumstances can have rather skewed results
>>> which people base their decisions on.
>>>
>>> Glad it has been fixed (would be nice to see some current bench tests).
>>>
>>> rr
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
>>> Post to : maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark Callaghan
>> mdcallag@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Mark Callaghan
> mdcallag@xxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
> Post to : maria-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
Follow ups
References
-
MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: Colin Charles, 2016-10-11
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: Justin Swanhart, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: Reinis Rozitis, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: Sergei Golubchik, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: Reinis Rozitis, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: Justin Swanhart, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: Reindl Harald, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: Justin Swanhart, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: Reindl Harald, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: MARK CALLAGHAN, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: MARK CALLAGHAN, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: Reinis Rozitis, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: MARK CALLAGHAN, 2016-10-12
-
Re: MariaDB Server 10.3 notes
From: MARK CALLAGHAN, 2016-10-12