maria-discuss team mailing list archive

[Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Am 15.03.2017 um 09:33 schrieb Sergei Golubchik:
> On Mar 14, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Am 14.03.2017 um 16:52 schrieb Reindl Harald:
> > > Am 14.03.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Daniel Bartholomew:
> > > > The MariaDB project is pleased to announce the immediate availability
> > > > of MariaDB 10.1.22. This is a stable (GA) release. See the Release
> > > > Notes and Changelogs for details
> > >
> > > if it only would build any longer...............
> >
> > most likely that are the problems (remove -Werror=format-security from
> > the output makes it easier to find)
> >
> > /usr/bin/make -f strings/CMakeFiles/strings.dir/build.make
> > strings/CMakeFiles/strings.dir/build
> > In file included from
> > /home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/mariadb-10.1.22/vio/vio_priv.h:25:0,
> >                   from
> > /home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/mariadb-10.1.22/vio/vio.c:24:
> > /home/builduser/rpmbuild/BUILD/mariadb-10.1.22/include/my_sys.h:649:43:
> > error: unknown type name 'PSI_file_key'
> >   extern int my_handler_delete_with_symlink(PSI_file_key key, const char *name,
> >                                             ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Sorry. I'm fixing it. Someone has reported
> https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-12261 about this issue, you can
> watch it if you want to be notified when it's fixed (hopefully, today).
>
> Also, I'll make sure this won't happen again

thanks

will follow a 10.1.23 release shortly or can we have at least a unified 
difdf which can be applied by rpmbuild?

P.S.: "MariaDB 10.1.22RC now available" with focus on the "RC" would be 
cool, httpd as example just move over the tarball to the stable folder 
and if something needs to be fixed they just skip that version - so you 
can be sure that if you already built a RC as package which became the 
GA tarball you don't need to rebuild at all and can easily help to 
verify releases