← Back to team overview

maria-docs team mailing list archive

Re: Mixing GPL licensed material into our documentation


Hi Henrik,

As I mentioned, I have changed the license to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

I assume this is compatible with the license of the MariaDB documentation.

However, that does not help you with the MySQL parts, as you say...

On Jun 3, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Henrik Ingo wrote:

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Daniel Bartholomew <dbart@xxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
On 12/05/2010, at 9:12 PM, Paul McCullagh
<paul.mccullagh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Paul> You are free to copy any part of the primebase.org documentation
Paul> to askmonty.org.
Paul> It is not stated, but in general our documentation is also GPL. I
Paul> will add this to our Web-site.


Thank you for licensing the documentation under the GPL and letting us
use it!

Hmm... this reminds me:

We've decided to use a combo of GFDL and CC BY-SA for our
documentation licenses.

Copying in documentation that is GPL licensed is probably not
possible, I'm sure the GPL is incompatible with at least CC BY-SA.

I'm not even concerned of the PBXT docs, I'm sure Paul would be
flexible. But I just realized we also use the MySQL help files, which
surely are GPL and we haven't seen much signs of MySQL being active in
relicensing their docs ;-)

This raises the question whether we should actually use GPL only as
the license for our manual? It is copyleft too, so a workable choice
even if it is "awkward" for literary works.

A key question would be how much will we lose (such as in man-days of
effort) if we just take away the MySQL help files from the manual?

email: henrik.ingo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
tel:   +358-40-5697354
www:   www.avoinelama.fi/~hingo
book:  www.openlife.cc

Paul McCullagh
PrimeBase Technologies

Follow ups