Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Hi Hugo, Thanks for the reply. In this case then I will ask that Marcos contribute it to the Zoo; since he created the ecore file from the XML Schemas. That seems to be the simplest solution. Cheers, Tim On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 17:24 +0100, Hugo Brunelière wrote: > Hi Tim, > > > First, thanks a lot for contributing to the zoo! > > > As an answer to your question, it is mandatory for us to ask for such > an official statement in order to avoid possible intellectual > properties issues. > > > All the people who worked on the open specification don't have to > provide their approval. > However, all the people which have participated to the building of the > actual Ecore metamodel (from the available specification) must do it. > > > I hope this clarify a bit what you have to do, and also help you to > understand the situation. > > > Best regards, > > > Hugo > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Tim Cook > <timothywayne.cook@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 16:44 -0200, Marcos Didonet Del Fabro > wrote: > > > If you think it is appropriate, you can publish the MLHIM > rm.ecore > > metamodel into a repository of metamodels. > > This repository is called "Zoo of metamodels". > > http://www.emn.fr/z-info/atlanmod/index.php/Atlantic. > > So far, it contains ~300 metamodels from different domains, > and with > > different degrees of completion. > > > > It is often used as a reference by the modeling community > (academics). > > > Hi Marcos, > > I was going to submit the rm.ecore metamodel but ran into a > rather > strange requirement. In order to contribute, you have to be > the sole > author of the content. > > >From the site: > > "You should also certify and copy/paste in the text of the bug > that: > > * I, your name, certify that I author 100% of the > contribution > * I, your name, agree to publish the content of my > contribution on > the AtlanMod Zoos under the EPL licence. > > While all MLHIM content is distributed under open source/open > content > licensing it may or may not be in compliance with the EPL. > Also, there > is no "one person" that controls the MLHIM artifacts. That is > why the > MLHIM Owners concept was formed so that everyone that > contributes shares > equally in ownership. This avoids the probability that a > specific > special interest can ever control the artifacts. > > As you may notice I have CC'd Hugo also so that he may > comment on the > situation. > > Cheers, > Tim > > > -- > *************************************************************** > Timothy Cook, MSc > Project Lead - Multi-Level Healthcare Information Modeling > http://www.mlhim.org > > LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook > Skype ID == timothy.cook > Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook > > You may get my Public GPG key from popular keyservers or > from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home > > > > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hugo Bruneliere - R&D Engineer > AtlanMod Team (EMN & INRIA) - Room B206 > Ecole des Mines de Nantes > 4, rue Alfred Kastler > 44307 Nantes Cedex 3 - France > office. +33 (0)2 51 85 82 21 > cell.+33 (0)6 07 42 45 30 > EMails: hugo.bruneliere@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hugo.bruneliere@xxxxxxxx > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > -- *************************************************************** Timothy Cook, MSc Project Lead - Multi-Level Healthcare Information Modeling http://www.mlhim.org LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook Skype ID == timothy.cook Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook You may get my Public GPG key from popular keyservers or from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |