mlhim-owners team mailing list archive

[Luciana Tricai Cavalini <lutricav@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Tim,

My answer is "yes" (IMO). The impression that I have is that
implementing the Reference Model in XML Schemas is the most
"language-agnostic" that we can get.

Cheers, Luciana.


Em 19/02/2011 11:04, Tim Cook escreveu:
> Hi All,
> 
> I would like to get some input on this issue. 
> 
> 
> I do not want to risk getting into any technology that limits the
> overall viability of MLHIM (therefore OSHIPxx) But of course for real
> world use, at some point choices must be made. 
> 
> As you all know, Marcos has taken the original schemas that I provided
> and created an EMF model.  (My use of terms/words here may not be
> precise as I study EMF). 
> 
> My little bit of research so far tells me that yes, we can generate XML
> Schemas from the EMF model.  Now every implementation language has
> binding capability to XML Schema.  So the reference model
> implementations in each language should be fairly straight forward.  
> 
> While the Eclipse EMF tools are more popular in Java land than other
> places.  The ability to work with XML Schemas seems to bridge any of
> those issues with Python, Ruby, Lua, etc. 
> 
> For management of something as complex and varied as MLHIM is; I believe
> it is key to have a central starting point.  
> 
> The question I have for all of you.  Does, Eclipse EMF appear to be a
> valid foundation for us to do the formal modeling in.  Then creating XML
> Schemas as the "reference implementation" that everyone else can work
> from? 
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mlhim-owners
> Post to     : mlhim-owners@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mlhim-owners
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

-- 
Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antivírus e
 acredita-se estar livre de perigo.