mlhim-owners team mailing list archive
-
mlhim-owners team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00400
Re: Coded Entry types question
Hello MLHIM Owners,
A question to Tim:
Are we back to Protegé instead of EMF for the 'final' version of the CDD?
Thanks,
Luciana.
Em 22/12/2011 23:37, Timothy Cook escreveu:
> Hi All,
>
> Just as a reminder, 2.3.0 final will be ready on 1 Jan. 2012.
> Checking many details has brought me back to the issues I have had
> before about declaring coded entries (DvCodedString) that have
> attribute names that are inline with the current industries of
> vocabulary/ontology management. My point is that if the attribute
> names are the same then it will be easier for knowledge modelers
> familiar with tools like Protege.
>
> Does anyone have any input on changes that are needed?
>
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
--
Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antiv�s e
acredita-se estar livre de perigo.
Follow ups
References