← Back to team overview

mlhim-owners team mailing list archive

Re: Coded Entry types question

 

Hello MLHIM Owners,

A question to Tim:

Are we back to Protegé instead of EMF for the 'final' version of the CDD?

Thanks,

Luciana.


Em 22/12/2011 23:37, Timothy Cook escreveu:
> Hi All,
> 
> Just as a reminder, 2.3.0 final will be ready on 1 Jan. 2012.
> Checking many details has brought me back to the issues I have had
> before about declaring coded entries (DvCodedString) that have
> attribute names that are inline with the current industries of
> vocabulary/ontology management.  My point is that if the attribute
> names are the same then it will be easier for knowledge modelers
> familiar with tools like Protege.
> 
> Does anyone have any input on changes that are needed?
> 
> Thanks,
> Tim
> 
> 

-- 
Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antiv�s e
 acredita-se estar livre de perigo.



Follow ups

References