Also from Jo: > In order to clean up, perhaps Canonical and Ubuntu would consider a much louder support for XDG Base Directory Specification? Many developers are hesitant to follow it, perhaps a strong leadership is required there as well? > This seems like a real win, too. Looks like quite a few apps do support it. This sort of thing is useful for us to say "is a requirement for main inclusion in the next LTS", to try an accelerate adoption. Mark
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature