[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ayatana] Indicator-Network
- To: cmaglothin <cmaglothin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Indicator-Network
- From: Apoorva Sharma <appi2012@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 13:26:20 -0800
- Cc: ayatana <ayatana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc :x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=c0y9r3j1ROzMqQxGQ4IlR1T0skvxaJZPc8/sV+i4mS4=; b=AKxEzmGcDaMGOM2gVBn2n1HY02b6XrN2VIZ4C4WXZoKUSj6WYveE3IhRAVMnNUc5nM a0lJblrAUofX6eXOI81ZMLN6330uyRVlYcEUA9mnOWQfMGUhnRmeHpHk5QVANz93nXjl +pUCMEhFnT40aOFm1LgiQLFXIpxsehaxXiRR4=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; b=lCiJl4SKW/rTw3Hmb3sIWLK2s3Wb8jX96p5FPcsvzzdlzLtnuJbIZEihqaBk57CE9R BTuoYX2gRykfagd8jbRayg5mWvSIVdQbGSrjsmuytQwjOKsKdcZfqOItrDJzjfwj+CTK rRy4zP9dnQ0ZmU1GR1mEHT+a4isJxxXilNE9M=
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=G90cc12OHTy7G9bu-5goVUT_R4hxkee7Fjj1A@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://lists.launchpad.net/ayatana>
- List-help: <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
- List-id: <ayatana.lists.launchpad.net>
- List-owner: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- List-post: <mailto:ayatana@lists.launchpad.net>
- List-subscribe: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- References: <AANLkTi=G90cc12OHTy7G9bu-5goVUT_R4hxkee7Fjj1A@mail.gmail.com>
On Dec 30, 2010, at 1:29 PM, cmaglothin <cmaglothin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I do not know whether this is the correct place to post this, but after a couple weeks of using Natty I felt that the current indicator for networking is rather messy. I do not mean that in a way that is harmful, and I feel that this is probably due to the fact that it IS developing software. Nonetheless, I took a little time to make a mockup of my own wishes for the future of indicator-network. My mockup is attached below. Feel free to give criticism and comments, I like feedback.
> <indicator-networkMockup.png>
+1
The current network indicator is big, inefficient, and cluttered. Your mockup looks really good. However, I think mpt's proposed design below solves your problems.
However, I like your idea of showing the IP address. Perhaps that could be added to this setup.