[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ayatana] Thoughts on Unity design
- To: Phong Cao <phngcv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Thoughts on Unity design
- From: Evan Huus <eapache@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:02:10 -0400
- Cc: ayatana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=//tkaDwfXJ5Sils+uUklDuuWRf6dFP5Zku/7nFeqWGU=; b=CF2aZf+kkD7Wd8xfr7N3mvxlBBrajUSlhR/xkYlyPvBX3Q34Ruv8MZv6RTcWgBPQZE dgNELz1TxMRXLp5PZ2KAlFhjUzC5a8+g/siNRBNCAMlFdCdzek80+sJcG+Fo2/9cbFx6 IJysVxj16UxEDMDJNhWGbY8PMQBZfPoU9c1Yc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=jK14X7UKv8fa/n6k5mDZfx7Bsql4Xkh2IqMEHUEQG4a9gt2R/KiJTEdB+ghf6aP1Db eVS4srwxGp9pmL1J3CP+57Re7azCvcbs5+hVRKQBpwivHZpDhwpr8YFZov6YvoqO7fZH tceYr04nc9PqM8L0nHdLLTw64s7kfIuzsJNlA=
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=37gQ=iJ-CRR4NE-H3EV84xa=4=w@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://lists.launchpad.net/ayatana>
- List-help: <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
- List-id: <ayatana.lists.launchpad.net>
- List-owner: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- List-post: <mailto:ayatana@lists.launchpad.net>
- List-subscribe: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- References: <BANLkTi=knhnAFa_KfPjckBue-3jUiYPFMA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=37gQ=iJ-CRR4NE-H3EV84xa=4=w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Phong Cao <phngcv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am too have been for a long time a Ubuntu's fan. However, I am not trying
> to be negative but... I would say that Unity's design is way far behind
> GNOME Shell in Fedora 15. I recommend anybody in this email list try out
> Fedora 15 & GNOME Shell and learn from their simplicity. (Just my thought,
> no offense). After couple days get along with Fedora 15 & GNOME Shell I feel
> that GNOME Shell is more newbie-friendly and productive than Unity. I think
> Ubuntu should reconsider going back to GNOME..
I have not used Gnome Shell extensively, however I do quite like
Unity, at least compared to Gnome2.
I'm curious what specific things in Gnome Shell you find superior to
Unity, and why. If you can be more specific, it will help us correct
those problems in the next version of Unity.
Thanks,
Evan