[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ayatana] Some feedback regarding Unity
- To: ayatana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Some feedback regarding Unity
- From: Ed Lin <edlin280@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 14:28:11 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=imRBXFhZdtTiHlMHjHnam+VeKgrnBtzbyRsu9nytEzM=; b=tCMcVHtk/+ONSrVSVe6tTP/SMBDFUmLd1E7e8bZzXfn9UDWLS+wBQe/8YKadGs3slL 1kryT6mM3pF5eoakFO9YkD7jaYtOIEuR0nzzwDlg3jsd67RypA+igl9R6OSRFsrkDdDm pmRRqjVIwPNVjEz1LPNem727scDkUgcst1z/w=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Fxw0l7dhQPhKCxHdJ83xdHGgR2zXB1zY/DRvkdYJLmS7nyhlGdjIUFdwLCuB9ZZADe PTxIoCl5/jiNbXvYqfEKQ3JP6WFrmals0oLs1iuaGVwH4EluLNBHBxcF/yhajc/Kd/KX I7k31+Xga+SwciOIUj0jybYOnMdDakZ5XuPMw=
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=4Z_thmSWSUurqHbDvK8riBrzEQw@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://lists.launchpad.net/ayatana>
- List-help: <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
- List-id: <ayatana.lists.launchpad.net>
- List-owner: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- List-post: <mailto:ayatana@lists.launchpad.net>
- List-subscribe: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://launchpad.net/~ayatana>
- References: <BANLkTi=4Z_thmSWSUurqHbDvK8riBrzEQw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Adrian Maier <syraxes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hopefully there is interest in getting feedback about it . So here are some
> remarks about this new default interface of Ubuntu Linux.
I agree with everything you said, a lot has already been raised by
other too so I guess there are good chances for seeing most of it
answered in a "2.0".
> - I don't think that I can get used to the new concept of mixing
> "application buttons" with "started applications". I prefer a separate
> region on the screen used for displaying the open applications .
On OS X this bothered me too. I found a workaround: I removed ALL
icons from the dock, only running apps would be represented in the
Dock. For launching I exclusively used Quicksilver (launcher like
GNOME-Do).
When I had many windows per application open I still missed a real
window-centric taskbar but with Expose in a hotcorner it's acceptable
and sometimes (when working with images and not with same looking
text/document windows) even better than the Windows/GNOME2/KDE
taskbar.
The Unity launcher has one problem that makes it less usable for this
workflow: when there are more than one window on a desktop per
application you need to click twice to switch to it (first on the
launcher and then the scaled window). The OS X dock simply brings all
windows of an application to the foreground with one single click.
Most often this is what I want because if I want to switch to one
particular window I will use Super+W/Expose.