Provisionally, Mr. Gifford is correct. The are going to be started on, and presented for peer review. I'm debating how to go about this now less than I am whether to go about it at all.
I would like some opinions to feedback into this. I know what the designer said were good designed Ubuntu applications, but what do people here think are some? And why do you think that? (This includes, looks, structure, and behavior as well as integration.)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Stefanos A.
<stapostol@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Every desktop environment has its own set HIG. Unity is sufficiently different than Gnome Shell or KDE4 that it merits some form of guidelines, even if they are as simple as "must work with the global menu, must offer a tailored launcher menu and must follow global font settings". Most of these will be inherited from Gnome Shell and the rest will be additions for Unity-specific functionality (i.e. they will be supplementary rather than divisive).
Above all, canonical applications (as in Canonical *and* canonical) must follow these guidelines to the letter. Ubuntu One and the Software Center currently stick out like sore thumbs from the rest of the desktop. Not good at all.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp