neos team mailing list archive

[Johannes Wettinger <revager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Blueprint changed by Johannes Wettinger:

Whiteboard set to:
RECORD 1: SIMPLE (ENGLISH INPUT DATA)

PRODUCT OF THE REVIEW

[Name] Specification (Project Foo)
[Version] 1.1a
[Reference] Subversion repository

REVIEW PROPERTIES

[Name] First review of the Specification for Project Foo
[Description] <ANY>
[Comments] <ANY>

[General impression] In general the document seems to be ok.
[Final recommendation] Product accepted

REVIEW MEETING

[Date] <ANY>
[Location] Common meeting room (2nd floor!)

REVIEW ATTENDEE

[Name] Mr. Peter Smith
[Contact] <NULL>
[Role] Reviewer
[Focus] <ANY>

LIST OF FINDINGS FOR THE REVIEW MEETING

[Comments to the list of findings] <NULL>
[Comments to the review meeting] <NULL>

REVIEW FINDING 1

[Description] There are some typos in the table of contents!
[Reference] First page

REVIEW FINDING 2

[Description] The first paragraph on this page needs to be rewritten (difficult to understand).
[Reference] page 21

----

RECORD 2: COMPLEX (GERMAN INPUT DATA)

PRODUCT OF THE REVIEW

[Name] Spezifikation (Projekt “Foo”; Abteilung 'Ä&Ö'); 30% fertiggestellt
[Version] 2.5#build16 (frühe Vorabversion!; schon stabil?)
[Reference 1] http://www.uni-stuttgart.de/se/index.php?request=send&name=Theo#top
[Reference 2] @home; Abteilung 'A&Ö'
[Attachment 1] <ANY>
[Attachment 2] <ANY>

REVIEW PROPERTIES

[Name] Review der Spezifikation (Projekt “Foo”; Abteilung 'Ä&Ö')
[Description] In diesem Review wird die Spezifikation (Projekt “Foo”; Abteilung 'Ä&Ö') begutachtet
[Comments] Zu diesem Review gibt es keinen Kommentar. Zu diesem Review gibt es keinen Kommentar. Zu diesem Review gibt es keinen Kommentar. Zu diesem Review gibt es keinen Kommentar. Zu diesem Review gibt es keinen Kommentar.

[General impression] Die Spezifikation macht einen brauchbaren Eindruck
[Final recommendation] Akzeptiert; Prüfling kann ins Repository übernommen werden.

REVIEW MEETING 1

[Date] <ANY>
[Location] SunTrec-Raum #1.024

REVIEW MEETING 2

[Date] <ANY>
[Location] GS-Pool

REVIEW ATTENDEE 1

[Name] Student(in)
[Contact] <NULL>
[Role] Reviewer
[Focus] <ANY>

REVIEW ATTENDEE 2

[Name] “Jack the Ripper”
[Contact] jack@uni_stuttgart.org
[Role] Reviewer
[Focus] <ANY>

REVIEW ATTENDEE 3

[Name] The best scribe
[Contact] superscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[Role] Scribe

LIST OF FINDINGS FOR REVIEW MEETING 1

[Comments to the list of findings] <ANY>
[Comments to the review meeting] <ANY>

REVIEW FINDING 1 (LIST OF FINDINGS FOR REVIEW MEETING 1)

[Description] Es gibt einige Rechtschreibfehler im Inhaltsverzeichnis.
[Aspects] <ANY>
[Severity] <ANY>
[Reference 1] Seite 1 (nach PDF-Seitenzahl)
[Reference 2] Inhaltsverzeichnis
[Attachment 1] <ANY>
[Attachment 2] <ANY>

REVIEW FINDING 2 (LIST OF FINDINGS FOR REVIEW MEETING 1)

[Description] Der erste Absatz ist unverständlich formuliert.
[Aspects] <ANY>
[Severity] <ANY>
[Reference 1] Seite 21

REVIEW FINDING 3 (LIST OF FINDINGS FOR REVIEW MEETING 1)

[Description] Die Sonderzeichen ), (, #, % und $ werden nicht korrekt dargestellt.
[Aspects] <ANY>
[Severity] <ANY>
[Reference 1] Referenz 1 = Seite 34

-- 
(DOCU) System Test Data
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/revager/+spec/docu-system-test-data