nova team mailing list archive
-
nova team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00265
Moving away from SQLAlchemy models? What?
-
To:
nova <nova@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Soren Hansen <soren@xxxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:52:14 +0200
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4
Looking at the commit message for r316 on trunk, I see this (emphasis mine):
Also refactored NovaBase and removed several methods since they
would have to be changed *when we move away from sqlalchemy models*
and begin using sqlalchemy table definitions.
I find it worrisome that such things are stated as though they are
naturally given or generally agreed upon. I have no recollection of a
discussion to that effect, let alone a decision.
I certainly hope a big patch to do this doesn't suddenly turn up without
prior discussion and a related blueprint..
--
Soren Hansen
Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com/
OpenStack Developer http://www.openstack.org/
Follow ups