nunit-core team mailing list archive
-
nunit-core team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #01559
Re: [Bug 725718] [NEW] Documented overloads of Has.Property do not exist
The missing overloads once existed and were removed. The documentation
will be corrected.
However, the statement...
> If you want to specify a
> constraint for the property value, you have to explicitly do "new
> PropertyConstraint(...)".
is incorrect.
You can express constraints on properties using code similar to this...
Assert.That(obj, Has.Property("PropertyName").EqualTo(expected));
Charlie
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit
Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725718
Title:
Documented overloads of Has.Property do not exist
Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework:
New
Bug description:
Using NUnit 2.5.9.
According to the documentation at
http://www.nunit.org/index.php?p=propertyConstraint&r=2.5.9,
Has.Property has three overloads: one that just takes a property name;
one that takes a property name and an object, with implied
"Is.EqualTo" semantics; and one that takes a property name and a
constraint.
In reality, Has.Property only has one overload, which is the first of
the three (only takes the property name). If you want to specify a
constraint for the property value, you have to explicitly do "new
PropertyConstraint(...)".
Either fix the documentation, or (better yet) add the documented-but-
missing overloads.
References