nunit-core team mailing list archive

[Charlie Poole <charlie@xxxxxxxxx>]

Please enlarge on how you would like this feature to work at runtime.

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Rechenelf <809947@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> SetUpFixture should have the same possibilities with paramater as
> TextFixture, so that the class can have constructors with parameters.
>
> [TestFixture("GiantDb", "DbPass", IgnoreReason="does not work")]
> [TestFixture("SmallDb", "DbPass")]
>
> ** Affects: nunit-3.0
>     Importance: Undecided
>         Status: New
>
>
> ** Tags: feature
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to NUnit
> Framework.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809947
>
> Title:
>  SetUpFixture with parameter
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+bug/809947/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit
Core Developers, which is the registrant for NUnit Framework.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809947

Title:
  SetUpFixture with parameter

Status in NUnit Test Framework:
  New

Bug description:
  SetUpFixture should have the same possibilities with paramater as
  TextFixture, so that the class can have constructors with parameters.

  [TestFixture("GiantDb", "DbPass", IgnoreReason="does not work")]
  [TestFixture("SmallDb", "DbPass")]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+bug/809947/+subscriptions