nunit-core team mailing list archive

[Charlie Poole <charlie@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sounds cool. If you don't want to do a separate branch just send me
the files you changed.

Charlie

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Simone Busoli
<1051847@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've done a simple implementation which allows for the usage specified
> by the OP and in general considers enumerables which introduce recursion
> as not equal.
>
> Not sure it is really worth to add real support for recursive
> enumerables and for explicity identity comparison in Contains
> constraint, maybe the second is more desirable than the first though.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to NUnit
> Extended Testing Platform.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051847
>
> Title:
>   self contained item in array causes stack overflow
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunitv2/+bug/1051847/+subscriptions

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit
Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1051847

Title:
  self contained item in array causes stack overflow

Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  using System.Collections;
  using System.Collections.Generic;
  using NUnit.Framework;

  [TestFixture]
  public class Reproduction {
  	class SelfContainer : IEnumerable { public IEnumerator GetEnumerator() { yield return this; } }

  	[Test]
  	public void SelfContainedItemFoundInArray() {
  		var item = new SelfContainer();
  		var items = new SelfContainer[] { new SelfContainer(), item };

  		// work around
  		Assert.True(((ICollection<SelfContainer>)items).Contains(item));

  		// causes StackOverflowException
  		Assert.Contains(item, items);
  	}
  }

  Reproduced in NUnit 2.6.1

  See also bug #491300

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunitv2/+bug/1051847/+subscriptions