nunit-core team mailing list archive

["Max Guernsey, III" <max@xxxxxxxxx>]

Got it:  Make two set up fixtures in the same namespace.  All the other
variables I was investigating were red herrings.  Is it supported t have
two SetUpFixtures in the same namespace?  If not, it wasn't apparent to
me from the documentation.

Maybe the documentation should be changed from "Only one SetUpFixture
should be created in a given namespace" to "Only one SetUpFixture can be
created in a given namespace; if more than one fixture is specified for
a namespace, <however you decide which one gets used>."

In 3.0 can we lift those kinds of cardinality restrictions?  It is
irritating to have to merge two set up fixtures that control different
resources just to satisfy a rule like that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NUnit
Developers, which is subscribed to NUnit V2.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242502

Title:
  Now SetUpFixture doesn't work at all

Status in NUnit V2 Test Framework:
  New

Bug description:
  In 2.6.2, with the 2.6.2 runner, it used to be that a test suite with
  a SetUpFixture could not be used in flat list mode, which was no major
  inconvenience.  Now I get that same error message no matter how I have
  my runner configured.  This is true whether I use the 2.6.2 runner or
  the 2.6.3 runner.

  I know you aren't accepting bugs in V2.  If that's really true, I'll
  have to go back to 2.6.2.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunitv2/+bug/1242502/+subscriptions