nunit-core team mailing list archive

[Charlie Poole <question238356@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #238356 on NUnit Framework changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+question/238356

    Status: Open => Answered

Charlie Poole proposed the following answer:
Right now, our plans don't include a 2.6.4 release. OTOH, if you want to
work on this issue, I'll be glad to review the changes and integrate them
into the  source, where it would be available to anyone who builds from
source and would be in any release we eventually decided to put out. It's
more likely, however, that we would port your changes to NUnit 3.0 for
release.

Charlie


On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Danil Flores <
question238356@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> New question #238356 on NUnit Framework:
> https://answers.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+question/238356
>
> NUnit Team,
>
> As you may know, MBUnit is officially dead in the water and no longer
> maintained. Because of this, my company has decided to dedicate some
> resources to converting our existing MBUnit tests to NUnit and to use that
> going forward. I've been tasked with writing an automated tool to do this
> conversion since we have hundreds of thousands of test cases written with
> MBunit. My automated tool is able to do the job fine converting the MBUnit
> test patterns to their equivalents in NUnit, however, I've run into one
> snag in the way the [Row] attribute behaves vs the way the [TestCase]
> attribute behaves in it's handling of nullable types.
>
> I'm having the same issue as the poster of the bug
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nunit-3.0/+bug/461721. We have many tests that
> are passing around nullable types from rows and were working before with
> MBUnit. I've been looking at the NUnit 2.6.3 source code and have found a
> way to implement this feature myself, but would really like to work with
> you guys if at all possible to get it into perhaps NUnit 2.6.4. So far this
> is the only snag I've run into with NUnit and the rest of the conversion
> has been going pretty smoothly.
>
> If I can get a working solution to this in the NUnit 2.6.x code base,
> would you guys be able to code review it, provide feedback, and eventually
> release it? Or if there is an existing work-around for it, would you guys
> please let me know?
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Danil M. Flores
> Ultimate Software - Software Engineer
>
> --
> You received this question notification because you are a member of
> NUnit Core Developers, which is an answer contact for NUnit Framework.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core
> Post to     : nunit-core@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nunit-core
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of
NUnit Core Developers, which is an answer contact for NUnit Framework.