ocaml-maint team mailing list archive

[Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> As just written on irc, I agree that jocaml doesn't need a FFe (as I'd
> also like to see the ocaml transtion getting done asap).

I would caution here to distinguish between "doesn't need a FFe" and
"has been granted an FFe".  I can't tell from reading this bug log
whether you mean that the jocaml update doesn't include anything that's
affected by FF, or that all ocaml-related packages have a blanket
exception.  I don't think we want to do the latter without knowing what
kind of changes are included, or defining some limits on what's ok.

-- 
[OCaml 3.11.2 transition][round 2/6] Please sync packages involved in OCaml transition from Debian sid to lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522358
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Debian
OCaml Maintainers, which is a direct subscriber.

Status in “camlp5” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “confluence” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed
Status in “headache” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “hevea” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “hlins” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “jocaml” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “ocamlduce” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “ocamlwc” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “ocamlweb” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “planets” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released
Status in “polygen” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released

Bug description:
Binary package hint: camlp5

Hello,

Following the upload of OCaml 3.11.2 to lucid, please synchronize the following packages from Debian sid to lucid :

camlp5 (5.12-2 -> 5.12-3)
headache (1.03-17 -> 1.03-18)
hevea (1.10-10 -> 1.10-11)
hlins (0.39-15 -> 0.39-16)
ocamlduce (3.11.1.0-3 -> 3.11.2.0-1)
ocamlwc (0.3-7 -> 0.3-8)
ocamlweb (1.37-12 -> 1.37-13)
planets (0.1.13-9 -> 0.1.13-10)
polygen (1.0.6.ds2-8 -> 1.0.6.ds2-9)


Thanks in advance,

-- 
Stéphane