opencog-dev team mailing list archive

["Trent Waddington" <trent.waddington@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Joel Pitt <joel.pitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think in the long term, MindAgents or system processes will be
> represented as executable schema that are themselves made up of atoms.
> The MindAgent class is just a stop gap until we've reached the
> computational resources and opencog has the system maturity to
> implement them in this way.

In an ideal world I can see the advantages of that, but practically I
think you'll always have "native" MindAgents, and it would probably be
best if there were language bindings for a wide variety of languages
so you can write your code in whatever is best suited for the task.

I even imagine that some people will write a plugin to Mathematica or
other math programs so they can interface code written in those
systems.

Trent