opencog-dev team mailing list archive

["Joel Pitt" <joel.pitt@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Gustavo Machado Campagnani Gama
<gama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> I like your proposal in general. Just  but I have two caveats: 1. I have
> a feeling that we will eventually end up with a few cases where the name
> will be too long and unfriendly (getHandleSetByTypeOrTargetOrName...);
> 2. it'll make porting code from other novamente-derived trees a lot
> harder.

For those few very generic forms, then leaving them as getHandleSet
would probably be the best idea. Only those that are more specialised
would indicate as such in their name.

What should we use for keep tracking of specific tasks (rather than
generic ideas/projects) to be done at some indeterminate point in the
future? I see we don't have a TODO file yet, but there is a section in
README (am I correct in assuming the only item there, referring to
cxxtest and cmake, has already been done?)... or perhaps we should use
Launchpad bugs for these?

J