opencog-dev team mailing list archive

["David Hart" <hart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dynmod looks ready to me to become the new official unstable branch!

After the push, current work-in-progress should rebase to unstable (as soon
as is practical), and new work should be branched from unstable.

Under a 2-branch scheme, the trunk will be periodically rebased to unstable
and go through stabilization periods in anticipation of official versioned
releases.

-dave

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Joel Pitt <joel.pitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I tried it out, compiled and all tests succeeded (bar the AtomTable
> one which has been broken for a while now). Haven't looked in depth at
> the code though...
>
> Oh, another read me change...if the scheme shell runs on a separate
> port then the README should reflect that.
>
> David, do you agree that the dynmod is ready to be pushed as unstable?
>
> J
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Gustavo Machado Campagnani Gama
> <gama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'm waiting for dhart to give me the "go ahead" -- and I think he's
> > waiting for a bit more testing. So far, it seems that he was the only
> > one who has tried it.
> >
> > --
> > Gustavo
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 17:43 -0700, Joel Pitt wrote:
> >> Hi Gama,
> >>
> >> Just wondering if you plan to make the dynmod branch the unstable one
> >> soon. Just notice that you've had to do a lot of rebasing to it, and
> >> after committing my attention branch, I suspect you'll have to do
> >> more... Once there is a unstable branch we can switch to using that
> >> for a lot of development.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> J
> >
> >
>