openerp-community team mailing list archive
-
openerp-community team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00929
Re: new account_voucher available now
Hi,
I'm new to this list so I apologize if this isn't the appropriate venue or
is just obvious, no intention of wasting anyone's time.
But I wanted to say:
(1) Have just installed the account_voucher module - and it's great - thank
you for your hard work
(2) I have also seen the same error as Jerzy and solved it as follows:
1. Go to Administration -> Customization -> User Interface -> Views
2. Search for "View Name" account.bank.statement
3. Observe that there are *two *view names account.bank.statement.form
but with different "Xml ID" (account.view_bank_statement_form &
account.view_bank_statement_form2)
4. Further down the list you can see
account.bank.statement.voucher.form.inheret &
account.bank.statement.voucher.tree.inheret. You can also see their
"Inherited View" is account.bank.statement
5. Dig into these two views and you see that they are inheriting the
view with the "Xml ID" account.view_bank_statement_form
6. I edited these two views so they now inheret view with the "Xml ID"
account.view_bank_statement_form2
1. Edit desired view
2. Go to Extra Info
3. Change the Inherited View
7. The error is now gone
In doing this I also noticed two other views that inherit the "Xml ID"
account.view_bank_statement_form. Their "Xml ID"s are
account_analytic_plans.view_bank_statement_inherit_form
& account_payment.view_bank_statement_form
Maybe I will get an error related to these a little later, but I haven't
got that far yet.
Thanks again for your work on this, this has got me flying!
Sincerely,
Sarah Bird
----
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:59:23 -0800 Jerzy Orłowski wrote:
Hi, I am testing your version and I get
"View error
Can't find field 'voucher_id' in the following view parts composing the view
of object model 'account.bank.statement':
* account.bank.statement.voucher.tree.inherit
* account.bank.statement.voucher.form.inherit
Either you wrongly customized this view, or some modules bringing those views
are not compatible with your current data model"
Did you check, how your module works with bank statements or maybe I am missing
something?
On 23.11.2011 11:38, Frédéric Clementi wrote:
We already had the opportunity to tell you but this is an excellent job
guys. I really like the usability (check boxes, paid amount at the bottom) and
the speed ! At the moment, performance is lacking on today standard
voucher.
I would add that the few test I have done shows correct figures.
One thing though (I cannot only say that you are great !)... the exchange
rate difference between the real bank rate and the OpenERP rate goes to
write-off... in my view it should go to the currency difference amount.
What do you think?
Frédéric CLEMENTI
Business Solutions
Camptocamp SA
Tel : + 41 (0)21 619 1041http://www.camptocamp.com
<mailto:frederic.cleme...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <frederic.cleme...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
2011/11/22 Colin MacMillan <co...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <
mailto:co...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <co...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
Hi Olivier, glad to hear you have tested the module. The inheritance
approach was looked at but we decided against it ... perhaps we will
review it now as this is a good idea.
Regarding the testing, we tested it with our own scenarios and
also got
help from other openerp partners. The module is in 8 different live
implementations all using multi-currency so we are happy with the
accuracy. To be honest I've not yet work out how to do YAML tests
and it
is very technical and can I say 'geeky'. Personally I'd rather use a
spreadsheet with figures I know are correct, then test this out on a
system manually.
We are keeping an eye on the 6.1 version which is much better for
multi-currency but still varies significantly from a usability
standpoint.
Your viewpoints are appreciated.
Regards
Colin
-----Original Message-----
From: Olivier Dony [mailto:o...@xxxxxxxxxxx <o...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:o...@xxxxxxxxxxx <o...@xxxxxxxxxxx>>]
Sent: 22 November 2011 10:10
To: Colin MacMillan
Cc: openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [Openerp-community] new account_voucher available now
On 11/18/2011 01:15 PM, Colin MacMillan wrote:
> This module has a number of additional features:
>
> - speed - on_change has been replaced with a button for retrieving
> open lines
>
> - ergonomics - the layout and ability to select lines with a
tick box
> makes the screen very easy to use
>
> - the new approach is not top-down, but bottom-up in design which is
> more intuitive for the operator. Total appears at the bottom.
>
> - credit and invoice lines appear in different colours on the same
> list which is more logical
>
> - fully functional multi-currency - has already undergone heavy
> testing
>
> - 4 configurable accounts for write-off gain/losses and exchange
rate
> gains/losses
>
> - enhanced cancellation process - fixes error in logic that meant
> partial payments would be retrospectively unreconciled automatically
Great job, your module seems to work nicely and introduces interesting
ideas.
One question pops immediately: why not building it as an extension
of the
original account_voucher module, instead of duplicating the
functionality?
I did not check thoroughly, but it seems you copied enough of the
original
account_voucher module to stay compatible with the rest of the
system. So
presumably this could also be achieved with an inheriting module,
possibly
after refactoring some parts of the core that are currently hard to
inherit, and fixing any remaining bugs.
Your module would then be compatible with the official ones, simply
providing a variation on the workflow and screens of the original
account_voucher.
I suppose you have tried both approaches, so I would be interested
to know
how hard you think it would be to go the inheriting route,
imagining your
module as "account_voucher_alternative_layout", if you see what I
mean.
BTW, did you compare your module with the trunk/6.1 version of
account_voucher, or only with 6.0?
And one last question, if I may: there do not seem to be any YAML
scenarios/test in the source of your module, so what strategy did
you use
when you say it "has already undergone heavy testing"?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenerp-community>
Post to : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
<https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenerp-community>
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
Pozdrawiam serdecznie,
Jerzy Orłowski
Lacan Technologies Group
Członek Zarządu ds. technologii
Al. Stanów Zjednoczonych 53
04-028 Warszawa
tel. +48 (22) 266 01 02
tel. +48 (22) 292 16 16
kom. 668 151 245www.lacan.com.plwww.erpsystems.com.plwww.serwerownie.com
Lacan Technologies Sp. z o.o. Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie, XIII
Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego, KRS: 0000319673, NIP:
521-351-01-01
Kapitał zakładowy: 50.000 PLN
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
Post to : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp