openerp-community team mailing list archive

[Antony Lesuisse <al@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry for being rude, my point here was simply that if somebody really wants 
something it's probably easier to work on it than to convince someone else to 
do it.

For OpenERP Enterprise customers, our the migration service will find a 
solution for a smooth upgrade path on specific basis. (most likely 
base_action_rules). Maybe they will fix the module to make it work for v8. But 
this will happen after june.

We decided to move auditail to extra (with other modules) as we think they 
dont meet the quality standard for a long term release and we have alternative 
solutions to the use case (althought not fully equivalent). Auditrail in trunk 
is broken since 1 year and the only MP about it was made by Stefan Rijnhart 2 
years ago.

I want to close the merge window for v8 and we will merge wms this week and 
new api next week (not sure 100% yet). So even if we fix auditrail it will be 
later and the module wont be part of v8.

Sometime i have to decide to stop supporting bad code because it increase the 
technical debt too much. It then becomes a nightmare for the openerp 
enterprise team to support. It happened with the gtk client, and caldav in v7.

If i'm wrong, thanks to the open source nature of openerp, then i'm sure 
people will come to fix and maintain the code. I'm actually interested by the 
result of the survey. I just think that, often, time is better spent on code 
than on twitter :)

The good news is that after the wms merge quentin and his team will work full 
time on improving account and account localisations.


On 04/29/2014 02:14 AM, Antony Lesuisse wrote:
> If someone wants a version of auditrail working for v8 it would be much more
> productive to fix it than to complaint about it, make surveys and spam twitter.
>
> The source code is on launchpad, i provided the guideline on how to fix it.
> Are you coders or whiners :) ?
>
> I also think lp:server-env-tools would be a good project candidate to adopt
> this module.
>
>
> On 04/29/2014 01:28 AM, Antony Lesuisse wrote:
> > The v8 release is nearing and we recently moved the auditrail module to an
> > extra addons repository.
> >
> > We now have the _track_field mecanism and with base_action_rules you may
> > configure additional hooks to log events.
> >
> > The trunk version version auditrail is not just buggy it doesnt work at all on
> > v8.
> >
> > The main reason is that we now call the orm directly inside controllers and
> > templates, such calls dont pass anymore by the execute_cr layer. To fix
> > auditrail we would need to proxy the osv.Model object.
> >
> > I think that _track_fields and base_action_rules are enough for most of the
> > needs but it doesnt offer the same level of reporting as auditrail.log and
> > auditrail.log.line.
> >
> > If someone wants to fix auditrail i would recommend following:
> >
> > - add a depends on base_action_rules
> > - override _wrap_create and _wrap_write to call check_rules
> > - remove the dirty monkey patching of execute below.
> >
> > If read logging is really needed you would need to wrap read and read_group
> > aswell. One should be aware that read logging is not complete since v6.0 as it
> > doesnt log read_group.
> >
> > https://code.launchpad.net/openerp-extra
> >
> > I also moved project_long_term and document_* modules. For document_* i have
> > made a proof of concept document_fs module that should cover most of use case
> > of document_ftp/webdav.
> >
> > https://code.launchpad.net/~openerp-dev/openobject-addons/trunk-document-fs-al
> >
> >
> > On 04/28/2014 10:38 PM, Nhomar Hernández wrote:
> > > Hello All.
> > >
> > > We are so surprised about the exclusion of the features given by audittrail in
> > > OpenERP.
> > > Before make a public complain we exchange some comments with OpenERP and I
> > > want share with you the conclusions, but before create an opinion matrix about
> > > this change it is important for us answer this little survey
> > > <https://es.surveymonkey.com/s/JJHCZRJ>[1] to make assumptions based on better
> > > and real arguments.
> > >
> > > Can you help us to help you?
> > >
> > > Regards.
> > >
> > > [1] https://es.surveymonkey.com/s/JJHCZRJ
> > >
> > > --
> > > --------------------
> > > Saludos Cordiales
> > >
> > > Nhomar G. Hernandez M.
> > > +58-414-4110269
> > > Skype: nhomar00
> > > Web-Blog: http://geronimo.com.ve <http://geronimo.com.ve/>
> > > Servicios IT: http://vauxoo.com <http://vauxoo.com/>
> > > Linux-Counter: 467724
> > > Correos:
> > > nhomar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nhomar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > nhomar@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nhomar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > twitter @nhomar
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
> > > Post to     : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
> > > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
> > Post to     : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
> Post to     : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp