openerp-community team mailing list archive

[Ovnicraft <ovnicraft@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Stefan Rijnhart <stefan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Hi Joël,
>
> Maybe I don't understand, but having one addon per repo does that mean
> that when an API change requires a change in all the banking addons (for
> instance), that I have to make a pull request for all those repos?
>
> I'd be in favour of keeping OCA projects in bzr for 7.0 and in GitHub for
> 8.0. Should be less work for everybody. Just because OpenERP SA causes this
> overnight disruptive change does not mean that the OCA has to follow. Or
> does the app store not support Launchpad anymore either?
>

So akretion has a mirror for OCB at github[1] and all of us can works, in
fact ocb-7.0 is master :-) and it follows option a) suggested by Joel.

By now its now possible so i dont understand organization in github from
odoo, now master has server and addons in single repo, BTW move ASAP to
github approaching what exists is better.

Comments !



[1] https://github.com/akretion/openerp-server


>
> Cheers,
> Stefan.
>
>
>
>
> On 16-05-14 17:16, Joël Grand-Guillaume wrote:
>
>     Dear community,
>
>
>  After the announcement of the brand new odoo instead of OpenERP, the main
> changes for contributors currently is the switch to Github. As I know, most
> of you waited for such a move ! Now it's done :) Though it remain a quite
> huge question : How the hell do we, as the community, will manage this
> switch ?
>
>  I know there is lots of side questions (like making one repository per
> module, using subtree and many more). I see those options:
>
>  a) Move all projects from LP to Github, but only the 7.0 series to
> create only the master branch. Every devs should create the pull request
> needed if they want their LP MP to be shown as pull request on github. Then
> for serie 8.0, we start with one repo by module (as in option c):
>
> + => one LP project = one github project, Easy, quick,simple to
> understand, only "still active" MP will be ported by each devs
>  - => Every devs will have to rebuild the pull request, loss of review
> infos in the pull request (though people can copy/paste the link to LP)
>
>
>  b) Move all projects from LP to Github and try to take all branches
> related to a project using [1], create the master branch from the 7.0
> series. Then all devs will have to take back his branch, branch by branch,
> in his own name (that process [1] was use to move openstack to github).
> Then for serie 8.0, we start with one repo by module (as in option c):
>
>  + => one LP project = one github project, Keep all branches of all
> projects
>  - => Doesn't help to take back the MP as pull request, will let lots of
> "obsolete" branches
>
>
>  c) Try to immediately split repository to have one repo by module, all
> owned by the OCA project (only one project, many, many repos). Just making
> one repo by module. Then we can have those many repos grouped by topic
> using submodule (here an example:
> https://github.com/camptocamp/puppet-modules). By topic I mean "Apps"
> (like sale, purchase, ..).
>
>  + => We have one repo by module and start "clean" on github
>  - => Not that easy to split, not clear exactly how to do that, we have
> the risk that by the time we figure that out we remain on LP for quite a
> while, change the architecture and tools all at once.
>
>
> My suggestion to allow a fast move forward is option a) as the following:
>
>  1) Take all OCA projects on LP and create one under the OCA umbrella on
> github
>  2) Then I suggest to create the master branch on Github from the 7.0
> series on LP. Older one remain on LP only.
>  3) All current MPs must be made as pull request by his owner on GitHub to
> be merged.
>  4) All the 7.0 series starts on Github as soon as we have build them all
> (should not take more than 1 or 2 days to achieve. The older one (5, 6,
> 6.1) remain on LP.
>  5) For 8.0, we starts creating all needed sub-module repo
>
>  Mains args:
>
>   * Easy and fast
>   * Make a "smooth" transition as projects are kept, "just" moved on
> github
>   * Avoid having old MP or obsolete branches in the OCA umbrella
>   * For 7.0 serie we have everything on github, so we avoid working with
> both git and bzr
>   * For older serie we keep all on bzr, while future v8.0 will have a
> clean one repo by module solution
>
>
>   Who's in favor of which option here (a,b,c) ? Any others I missed ?
>
>
>  Thanks for your vote ! Please try to be as short as possible on your
> answer, so we can see who's voting for which option :)
>
>
>
>  Best regards,
>
>
>
> Joël
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/termie/lp2gh/blob/master/docs/moving_branches.rst
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>   *camptocamp*
> INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
> BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS
>
>  *Joël Grand-Guillaume*
> Division Manager
> Business Solutions
>
>  +41 21 619 10 28
> www.camptocamp.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
> Post to     : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
> --
> Therp - Maatwerk in open ontwikkeling
>
> Stefan Rijnhart - Ontwerp en implementatie
>
> mail: stefan@xxxxxxxx
> tel: +31 (0) 614478606http://therp.nlhttps://twitter.com/therp_stefan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
> Post to     : openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>


-- 
Cristian Salamea
@ovnicraft