← Back to team overview

openerp-india team mailing list archive

[Bug 882528] Re: [6.1 trunk] [project] confusing features - improvement suggestions

 

The organization of a project is not natural for new users. Most newcomers are used to work with MS-Project or alikes products, and thus the first approach is to think in projects and interrelated tasks, where dependencies among tasks are defined at the task level.
The two path approach of OpenERP (Projects with tasks OR projects with phases and tasks, with different schedule methods and additional object like project phases) is counter-intuitive
In memory project managers use to reschedule and compute on the fly dates whenever the user change task status or dependencies. Perhaps on OpenERP is technically difficult to get this kind of response, but at least rescheduling should be handled on the project form, whithout different paths for project with phases and projects with just tasks.
Additionally, it seems counterintuitive not to have programed start and end dates on tasks lists. For the user is most of the time the only important information to watch.
It is also to note that with the current approach of navigation, in the case you have a list of several projects with many tasks, whenever you change from project to tasks or when you are assigning task dependencies, you loose the domain information, and thus you keep entering the project name in the search view to keep the list at an usable size

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenERP
Indian Team, which is subscribed to OpenERP Addons.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882528

Title:
  [6.1 trunk] [project] confusing features - improvement suggestions

Status in OpenERP Addons (modules):
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Hello,

  I would like to underline some confusing features in the [project]
  module/addon.

  1. Since a few revs, the Project->Project->Project menu changed to
  Project->Configuration->Project. I think that 'Configuration' menu
  items should be used for setting the meta-data (data about the data -
  types, categories, periods, &c.) and not for "real" data.

  2. Tasks hierarchy : there is a straightforward feature of parent-
  child relationship for tasks. However, the view lacks clarity:

  - for a parent task, the work done in a child task should be presented under the 'Work' tree maybe as:
  (child) task | summary | user_id and so on

  - for a child/independent task, the same should be seen, but without
  the task name (as is today). BTW, some info, as 'project' is
  redundant, as I see no use of listing tasks from different projects.

  - in the second tab (Delegations) two different concepts are mixed:
  hierarchy and delegations. While the first area (parent task) works as
  expected, I think the "delegated tasks' could be improved; there is no
  difference between 'delegated' and 'child' tasks. And it should be.

  The way I see 'hierarchy' - meaning a parent contains all children
  (parent work = sum of children work) shall also be differentiated from
  'dependency' meaning that one task depends on the completion of
  another (like delegated task - check).

  In the project module, 'delegation' contains 'dependency', however
  there is no way to set 'dependency' besides 'delegation'.

  To conclude, I think that:
  - parent task should be a real "container", which shall adapt / put constraints on its children (time, costs, &c.)
  - parent work should show sum of children work
  - 'Delegations' tab should be called 'hierarchy' and show only parent-child relationships (not 'delegated' tasks, even if today they are also children- why?? a delegated task changed its initial assignee, and an additional check task is dependent on its completion)
  - dependence (Start B if A is completed) should be available for any task not only for delegated-check pairs.
  - hierarchy, delegation and dependency are three different basic concepts which should be implemented separately in the module (and not as additional modules). 

  
  If this is not the right place for this, I do apologise in advance. 

  Thank you,
  Bogdan

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-addons/+bug/882528/+subscriptions


References