openerp-india team mailing list archive
-
openerp-india team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #11219
[Bug 996816] Re: using _inherit and _name for a class is not modular
Hello qdp,
Sorry for the the inconvenience. My keyboard was stuck that's why I am
not able to completed the comment.
let me continue.......... please ignore above example. I am writing here
again!
I am giving you a one small example, I think which is more helpfull.
Class test_test(osv.osv):
_name = test.test
_columns = {
'name': fields.char('Name', size=64),
}
Class test_test_new(osv.osv):
_name = test.test.new
_inherit = 'test.test'
_columns = {
'number'
}
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of OpenERP
Indian Team, which is subscribed to OpenERP Server.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996816
Title:
using _inherit and _name for a class is not modular
Status in OpenERP Server:
New
Bug description:
If you define a class that use _inherit and _name, to make a copy of
the parent class, you expect that any modification made by a tier
module is applied to both the parent and the copy classes. But it's
not the case and here are the steps to help you to figure it out:
1°) My aim is to use a copy of the stock.picking class for incoming shipments, it will allow me to simplify the code a lot (especially in the views definition). So i defined a class stock.picking.in as follow (stock/stock.py):
class stock_picking_in(osv.osv):
_inherit= 'stock.picking'
_name='stock.picking.in'
_table='stock_picking' #(here the copy model is using the same table as the parent, but it's not relevant for the bug description, and the same apply if the table is different)
...
2°) in purchase module, i changed the one2many field on the purchase order that referred to the stock_picking table. What i need to do is to reference the class stock.picking.in, instead of the stock.picking. So i defined it as follow (purchase/purchase.py, line 176):
'picking_ids': fields.one2many('stock.picking.in', 'purchase_id', 'Picking List', readonly=True, help="This is the list of incoming shipments that have been generated for this purchase order."),
3°) the purchase module already include some code to add the field purchase_id on the stock.picking class and table (purchase/stock.py):
37 class stock_picking(osv.osv):
38 _inherit = 'stock.picking'
39 _columns = {
40 'purchase_id': fields.many2one('purchase.order', 'Purchase Order',
41 ondelete='set null', select=True),
42 }
So i thought it would be ok like this... But, no it isn't. At the
purchase module installation a traceback is telling me that the field
purchase_id doesn't exists on the stock.picking.in model. The addition
of it on stock.picking didn't propagate to my class.
This is really problematic because it means that using _inherit and
_name on the same class is not modular.
*Note that, in the meanwhile this bug is solved (if it will be) i this used a workaround: i just copied the add of the purchase_id field on my new stock.picking.in class too, in this way (purchase/stock.py):
129 # Redefinition of the new field in order to update the model stock.picking.in in the orm
132 class stock_picking_in(osv.osv):
133 _inherit = 'stock.picking.in'
134 _columns = {
135 'purchase_id': fields.many2one('purchase.order', 'Purchase Order',
136 ondelete='set null', select=True),
137 }
So yeah, it works but it's not convenient. If we want to use more and more this feature we should improve its modularity. Please be kind and remove this hack[*] whenever the framework support this feature.
Thanks,
Quentin
[*]: the same applies for the sale module, of course. Lines to remove when it's fixed are in sale/stock.py
189 # Redefinition of the new field in order to update the model stock.picking.out in the orm
192 class stock_picking_out(osv.osv):
193 _inherit = 'stock.picking.out'
194 _columns = {
195 'sale_id': fields.many2one('sale.order', 'Sale Order',
196 ondelete='set null', select=True),
197 }
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openobject-server/+bug/996816/+subscriptions
References