openjdk team mailing list archive

[Luk Claes <luk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:57:41 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> 
>> [Peter Green]
>>> *The "rc" bug (491362) that is open against openjdk gets downgraded (I
>>> beleive it should be downgraded but as a non-dd I don't belive it is
>>> my place to downgrade a bug based on an unclear bit of the rc policy)
>> I agree that it should be downgraded, as the package never
>> successfully built on s390, and thus failing to build is an important
>> bug, not a serious bug.  Downgrading.
>>
> Is there any evidence that the package builds on *any* architecture?
> AFAICT, none of the binaries in the archive have corresponding logs on
> buildd.debian.org.

The current ones probably will build now that binaries are available as
these 3 arches were bootstrapped... I can confirm that it builds for
amd64. Though I had the impression that openjdk-6 was meant to be built
on most arches and wouldn't have downgraded the FTBFS bug against
openjdk-6. I would like to see a fix for this bug in lenny, though the
maintainers may think differently?

Cheers

Luk